2007-04-20 08:25:26 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Environment
on mars or on titan!
Mars is the nearest choise with water-ice on polars.if we will manage to heat the Mars,it will be a planet where we can live in.
Actually.according to the latest NASA's researches,Titan is more likely to earth with rivers under the thick ice layer.but it is very far away...how could we get there...
2007-04-20 08:39:45 · answer #1 · answered by Hurricane 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Two different cases:
If we peacefully destroy the earth, then by destroy we will mean kill most everything. Some species will live through this current mass extinction, and continue to evolve. Our species could very well do this. Of course, we'll lose all the progress we've made since the agricultural revolution, but we'll learn it all again, and repopulate the earth again.
If, however, we destroy the world with nuclear energy (and the US is fine with invading another country just for oil control, so it's certainly conceivable that we could instigate a nuclear war if we were going through a mass famine brought on by, say, global warming) then things will obviously be much different.
2007-04-20 08:43:08 · answer #2 · answered by micahcf 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The answer is that in all probability we will not destroy the earth, BUT if we do there will never be somewhere else to go. Ideas of colonizing another planet are just pie in the sky. Even going to the moon is in no way the same as the Mayflower going to the new world, even given technology many years hence.
2007-04-20 10:40:06 · answer #3 · answered by John W 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We are not going to live. If the predictions for global warming are on the mark, we will be extinct in less than 50yrs. That is not enough time to find another suitable planet, not to mention move humanity there.
Of course we could go extinct much sooner, as some stupid trigger happy country might decide to start a nuclear war before global warming takes care of life on the planet.
2007-04-20 09:37:41 · answer #4 · answered by Mohammed R 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They had hoped to terra form Venus but it won't be near enough ready in time .
The moon and mars are too short on water (needed by carbon based life forms) .
The Australian drought and the disappearance of the honey bees ( critical for crops ) in the U.S. , will have adverse consequences long before any terra forming plan works .
2007-04-20 08:37:17 · answer #5 · answered by kate 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Emmerdale
2007-04-20 08:30:43 · answer #6 · answered by Trevor h 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Then be too late to think about this question. Previously we must to decide what to do to avoid this adventure.
2007-04-20 09:33:18 · answer #7 · answered by franjo.posta 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
President Bush has a plan. Alberto Gonzales drew it up. Cheney amended it.
Don't you feel better??!
2007-04-20 08:33:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
that is why Hell was invented to accomodate you guys
I did not destroy anything so .i am still looking for a place,Sirus sounds OK
2007-04-20 08:35:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
i suggest we got leave in the space
2007-04-20 09:03:19 · answer #10 · answered by tolulope p 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋