Depends on if the Judge is a vegetarian.
2007-04-20 04:16:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by bonsai bobby 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
It's better than eating a PBJ sloppily as a zombie, yes. Snoogie woogie wips.
Long live Calvin and Hobbes!
_()_
2007-04-20 11:33:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by vinslave 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends. Is this like one of those gay German cannibal incidents where he put an advert in the paper to find someone to eat? And whatever happened to that guy? His 'victim' volunteered to be killed and eaten. (And was, of course!) I would love to know what the German authorities decided to do with him. Murder? Abuse of a corpse? Assisted suicide AND abuse of a corpse? What would the charge be in Germany?
~Morg~
2007-04-20 11:18:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by morgorond 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
You know, I'm sick of "so-called" atheists coming in here and not even knowing that a REAL atheist eats a baby every morning (two if they're really small babies or really big atheists!)
;)
2007-04-20 11:19:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
lol, would cannibalism protect by the first amendment because if it is than there's no case.
2007-04-20 11:22:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mosh 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I f Al Gore was president it would be legal. His name isn't 'gore' for nothing. He hates waste!
2007-04-20 11:20:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by madbaldscotsman 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It doesnt matter if you eat the person or not, its still murder.
2007-04-20 11:17:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
well ask the people being eaten how they feel about that! LOL
2007-04-20 11:16:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Angela C 6
·
0⤊
0⤋