English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

We are still at War Because, Our President is Hell Bent on His Own Selfish Agenda. Our County, In this Last Election, Clearly Chose Democratic Candidates that Oppose the War. Our Country was Falsley Led into this War with Tainted Information from our President (and Backed by the Fundamentalist Christians, which he is just using for political gain). Bush Refuses to listen to the American Majority because he and his Elite Group of Friends have to Much invested in Oil and Money to change their ways. This will all End Soon as Soon as the New Democratic President goes into office. Peace at Last

2007-04-18 15:46:18 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

27 answers

This wacko-liberal agrees with your statement!

EDIT: Not exactly the same reception you received last night, is it?

2007-04-18 16:03:46 · answer #1 · answered by Active Denial System™ 6 · 1 0

Will you stop the nonsense.
So, Bill Clinton is a Fundamentalist Christian? HE thought Iraq had WMD. We were wrong, it does not mean the Information was tainted!
I suppose you would have pulled out of Iraq, left them to fend for themselves, and allow an Iran-Iraq terror state?
too much invested in oil and money?
I suppose the attempt on Cheney was part of this agenda?
I guess 9/11 WAS an inside job, too?
But how was THIS president responsible for the FIRST Trade Center attack, and the USS Cole, and the US Embassies?
What does the fact u are Gaay have to do with anything you wrote???

2007-04-18 22:59:10 · answer #2 · answered by Supercell 5 · 0 2

No, I do not agree. I did not know that keeping our country safe from terrorists was a selfish agenda. You know, we often forget that Sadaam Hussein was giving money to the families of suicide bombers who went into Israel and killed innocent civilians.

And since you are talking about crazy conspiracy theories like starting this war for oil, let's have another one. Iraq didn't have nuclear technology? Isn't it interesting that after the war started and there were "no WMD's" that Iran all of a sudden starts building the things? I mean, come on -- even the slowest of people should be able to see that connection.

I'm just thankful that John Kerry and Al Gore didn't get in or we would be sitting back and letting the terrorists get an even stronger foothold in the world (as they did under the eight years of Bill Clinton)!! Of course, they might have been so afraid that they might have given all kinds of money to the terrorists so that they would not have attacked or built those bombs. (Just as they did with North Korea)

2007-04-18 22:58:25 · answer #3 · answered by brevboy 2 · 3 2

If you choose to call it a "war" then so be it, but be prepared to be met with reciprocal anger. Personally I consider myself to be in a life, and living it the best way i can, using it to educate people--you don't have to be a militant activist to make a difference--hell, the militant activists haven't been faring too well lately, I cite your own details as the proof

2007-04-19 03:43:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I couldn't read it because your punctuation is terrible. Definite overuse and inappropriate use of capital letters.

Also, like any President, Democrat or Republican, will be able to extricate you Americans (and we Australians, I must admit) from the quagmire you've created in Iraq swiftly. That won't be happening for years to come yet! So sit back, enjoy the televised war theatre!

Vale to you

2007-04-18 23:02:29 · answer #5 · answered by the_supreme_father 3 · 0 2

Well can I ask you this, Do you feel that Saddam should still be in power?
You know He still could be if he had followed the rules and allowed the UN to come in and inspect. Scary thought uh, all the killings would still be going on over there by Saddam

by the way, I will not vote for any of the Democrats that are running, I don't like them

2007-04-18 22:51:26 · answer #6 · answered by Michelle 7 · 3 3

You know what frightens me? I saw some news commentators say that they fear if Hillary or Obama go up against ANY Republican, chances are we'll have another 4 more years of Republicans. Now I'm as dumb as a stump but I think I could do a better job than Bush

2007-04-18 23:13:39 · answer #7 · answered by gitsliveon24 5 · 0 3

I agree with you - soon things will get better. Don't listen to these redneck idiots on here who will criticize you and your way of life.

They are just ignorant and the world would be better off if their moms would have taken a coat hanger to them as fetuses.

2007-04-18 22:58:25 · answer #8 · answered by scarson17 1 · 2 1

I agree with everything except for "This will all end soon as soon as the new democratic president goes into office." C'mon, politicians don't care about us.

2007-04-18 22:49:56 · answer #9 · answered by Diagoras 4 · 2 2

No it will not end when they get in, the policy is set by the rich elitist you spoke of and the pres change to give us an illusion of democracy but they have an agenda and will not sway from it till Christ returns, make sure you are ready here read this and get his Holy spirit and be sure you are ready!
http://www.freedomcame.com/glory/

2007-04-18 22:56:05 · answer #10 · answered by bungyow 5 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers