i was involved in an automobile accident shouldn't the person that hit me have gotten a ticket?

Question

I was rear ended and the person that hit me did not receive a ticket and i think that it is unfair

Answer 1

Did you call the police? Did they write a report? What does the report say? If it says that he was at fault, what more do you need.

Sometimes there is no fun in kicking someone who is already down.

Answer 2

There would have to be proof that the person broke the law. Simply rear-ending someone is not in and of itself illegal. Without being there when the accident happened, it's impossible to know whether the person was following too closely or breaking some other law.

Since you were rear ended, you will certainly be found not at fault, so I wouldn't worry about the ticket.

Answer 3

To put it out there and not to be short but unless a police department has a policy stating that when an accident occurs and a "at fault" driver can be determined then a ticket gets issued. 9 out of 10 times it is totally up to the officer on whether a ticket gets issued.

So to answer your question should they of yes, but chances are the officer didn't have to so he didn't write one.

it does not change who was at fault for the accident nor does that mean that you can not seek civil remedies against the person that hit you.

Answer 4

This is a misconception, in many police departments the police officer is under no obligatoin to issue a ticket, most will some don't. What really matters is how they write up the accident report, as long as they show the other driver as the one at fault, then thier insurance will pay.

So the at fault is who is recorded as such in the report, not who gets what tickets.

Answer 5

I am an insurance claims representive and i can tell you first hand, it depends on which state you live in. In Ky about the ONLY way you will get a ticket for causing an accident is having no insurance,dui or drugs. It is unfair but those people
will pay one day because they think they got away with something(the wreck causer)

Answer 6

This reminds me of a joke.

An Irish policeman was standing at the corner by a traffic light when suddenly the car which was stopped was hit from behind.

The Irish policeman approached the second car ready to give the driver a ticket when suddenly the car door open and his parish priest stepped out. The policeman said "Top of the mornin to you Father, how fast would you say the car in front of you was backing up when the accident happened?"

Sorry, I couldn't resist it.

Answer 7

i think of there exists a ill bleeding coronary heart mentality whilst it includes some negligent guy or woman reaching for a cassette tape or CD to put in the automobile stereo whilst making use of, or making use of one-exceeded whilst having an argument with somebody on a cellular telephone, and as a effect kills somebody through fact they are no longer paying interest. What happens is that the negligent driving force is presented psychiatric counseling to recover from their own trauma, unfavorable element, whilst the family members of the sufferer is thoroughly devastated and heavily isn't the comparable lower back. Your occasion is easy. specific, i think making use of decrease than the effect of alcohol and killing somebody might desire to be first degree homicide. My evaluate bringing up a lesser occasion of vehicular manslaughter is to declare that we are far too lenient, legally, with injuries. it particularly is why a lot of peoplechronic like a team of aholes, through fact they might injury out with it. we can start up by using no longer calling them "injuries." enable's settle for it, maximum "injuries" are not injuries in any respect. enable's call them what they are actually, "stupidities." it would a minimum of make for extra uncomplicated site visitors comments. "it is Jetcopter 4, we've a stupidity on southbound street 4, and an idiocy on street 20 close to Podunk. we've a significant moron incident with injuries blockading the East Numbchuck offramp." Honesty is the suitable coverage.

Answer 8

The Officer did not witness the accident, so he could not testify in regards to what happened. The accident report will clearly show what took place. If both parties have insurance, it would be an inconvenience, and unnecessary to force both parties to appear in court since the insurance companies will handle any claims. Now, if one party did not have insurance, or there were serious injuries, then a court appearance would be required.

Answer 9

You should press charges on him. A ticket isn't enough if he crashed into you and it was his fault. And if it was his fault you should sue him for any injuries you obtained due to the crash and for repair you may need for your car. And if the accident cause you to miss a couple of days of work, he could pay that to. Really, it just depends on the crash. You should have contacted the authorities right after the car crash.

Answer 10

What reason did they cop give for not giving them a ticket? That would make it easier to answer your question.