I need to know how the role of France was different from WWII and WWI.
2007-04-18 13:16:01 · 7 answers · asked by thinker_creater_inventor 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
The length and duration of WW1 on its' own land drained the will and desire of the French for second war with the possible loss of another generation of young men.
2007-04-18 13:23:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can't improve on an earlier poster's concise yet complete answer: when the trench warfare that characterized World War I was unceremoniously displaced by the blitzkrieg "lightning war" introduced by Germany's premier Panzer Leader, General Heinz Guderian, and his armored divisions at the very outset of World War II, warfare went from stationary and slow-moving to highly mobile and very fast-moving and the ways of waging war changed immediately, completely, and permanently.
2007-04-18 20:33:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The French learned that they could surrender much faster in WWII & avoid thall that messy fighting. They had much better collaborators in WWII. French hookers gave more STD's to more German occupation troops than all the hookers of all the other nations combined.
2007-04-19 17:11:09 · answer #3 · answered by preacher55 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The lack of trench warfare. The perfection of tank warfare.
2007-04-18 20:19:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
greman tactics kickass the french in ww2
2007-04-18 20:21:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Didn't they surrender in all wars??
2007-04-18 20:22:32 · answer #6 · answered by porcerelllisman q 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
two words.... trenches & massed-armour
2007-04-20 02:53:28 · answer #7 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋