Eventually, maybe not. I think there would be a problem with a lack of decay first. Fungi either decay dead organic matter, or are symbionts, which obtain carbon from living organisms. Fungi, called saprotrophs, decompose plant matter, where most of the carbon in terrestrial ecosystems is sequestered. Fungal respiration returns much of this carbon to the atmosphere as CO2. Plants in turn take the CO2 and sunshine to create carbohydrates. Then ectomycorrhizae, the fungus symbiotic with the roots of trees, exchange nutrients between the soil and plants.
Trees in temperate forests are dependent on the ectomycorrhizae that accumulate minerals from the decomposing litter, before the minerals pass into the deeper layers of the soil where they would be unavailable to the roots. In return the fungus obtains simple carbohydrates that are produced by the plant specifically for the fungus. The trees exchange nutrients they are unable to collect for them selves for carbohydrates the fungus cannot make for themselves from forest litter.
With no fungal symbionts the trees would die in the temperate forests but would not decay without the saprotrophic fungi. Aquatic and terrestrial fungi are critical to the transfer of litter bound carbon and other nutrients to higher trophic levels like trees. The fungus digests the tough plant structures, like lignin and cellulose, creating a palatable nitrogen rich food for their carbon and energy exchanges with trees. Therefore fungi are critical to the cycling of nitrogen and carbon in our ecosystem.
2007-04-18 06:47:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by gardengallivant 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It would not take long for the world as we know it to fall apart.
Fungi not only play a massive role in decay, meaning we're not up to our ears in roadkill, they also function in symbiotic (benficial to both) relationships. The most notable of these are mycorrhizae, the relationship between fungi and the roots of a huge number of plants. Because fungi can take up nutrients and food from the soil so quickly, plants employ them to do so for their benefit.
If all of these plants were unable to survive, imagine what would happen. Herbivores would die off, then carnivores, then us. Eek!
2007-04-18 07:35:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Gir 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
properly.... The surprising loss of the gravitational acceleration from the sunlight which holds us in orbit (and the consequent replace from a almost around direction to a today line of action) might probable kick off a brilliant form of earthquakes. reckoning on precisely whilst it handed off we'd lose the Moon as a satellite tv for pc, or we'd probably run into it. In the two experience there may be yet another super shifting of forces inflicting extra geophysical pastime the two on earth and on the Moon. for the reason that each little thing else contained in the photograph voltaic equipment might additionally start to go in a today line, we could probably run into all way of different orbiting photograph voltaic gadgets. yet that probable does no longer ensue for a number of days or perhaps weeks, in which era we'd all have frozen besides. those are the three biggies i will think of of offhand. And, as you reported, we'd freeze in relatively short order so, no count number what, we'd be screwed. Doug
2016-10-03 04:44:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I know the rain forest depends on fungi
2007-04-18 05:48:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
The whole ecological system would be disrupted and life would cease to exist eventually. What an interesting premise for a science fiction novel!
2007-04-18 05:54:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ken F 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No there would not.
2007-04-18 05:52:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by ithek_thundervoice 4
·
0⤊
0⤋