Probably about equally effective--in all three "wars," the rich ruling class benefits while the poor and minorities are crushed under the bootheels of "morality." The rich own the companies that prosecute the war on terror, while the poor have to fight, pay with their lives and pay with their taxes. The rich will always be able to get both abortions and drugs (even if it means going to other countries to get them). Heck, they'll get them from doctors, while the poor are forced to go to TJ chop shops for abortions, or forced to buy rocks on the street to support their habits.
2007-04-18 05:09:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Qwyrx 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
The abortion issue and drug issue, go more to changing the social climate, at least to be effective in limiting / eliminating. I don't know that I agree that the fight to stop abortion is a 'war'.
Abortion is different than drug use in that it is, in my view, is an issue concerning protecting the vulnerable. The un-born have no choice in the matter. The drug user does, for the most part.
The war on terror can be corrected to do a better job of protecting the innocent.
2007-04-18 05:09:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by super Bobo 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Less, because if abortion clinics become illegal, women will learn that there have been abortion methods nearly since pregnancy began.
Many plants, along with some over the counter drugs are capable of inducing an abortion. While this is less safe to the woman than an abortion in a controlled setting, such as a clinic or hospital, these methods may be resorted to if abortion is made illegal.
2007-04-18 05:08:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Deirdre H 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Well considering that all three were invented by neoconservatives for the purpose of directing the people's anger away from the government, I think it'll be quite effective. Obviously it's not going to stop abortion, but that isn't the point.
Of course it won't be quite as effective as the war on terror, which has the added advantage of being an actual war. Wars are great for the economy, as long as they're fought on foreign soil. Metaphorical wars also don't allow you to hold foreign citizens prisoner for long periods of time without charge.
2007-04-18 05:09:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
There are some international places in the international the place that's close to impossible to attain any drugs. the rationalization is incredibly straightforward. The penalty for drug possession is so extreme that each and anybody the drug clientele and sellers have been pushed deep underground. whilst i grew to become into youthful I did assorted traveling in the country. i could desire to purchase drugs in %ninety of the places I visited, and that i knew no person. i grew to become right into a suitable stranger and could desire to get drugs very almost each time and everywhere i needed. i don't use drugs anymore yet not something has replaced in 30 years. i will have self belief there's a "war on terror" as quickly as I study in the papers every day a catalogue of terrorist captured and achieved each and every day. i will't have self belief we are extreme approximately terrorist as quickly as we enable 14 million illegals to stay and artwork right here. whilst the terrorist at Guantanamo Bay stay greater suitable that they did in the previous they have been captured, are ingesting greater suitable and greater healthy and receiving greater suitable scientific care than many taxpaying human beings, how am i able to sense we are extreme approximately combating terrorists?
2016-10-22 12:38:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you are referring to the efforts of people to stop the deadly massacre of innocent babies in their mothers bellies, it will never be stopped as long as enough people are blind to truth.
If you want a taste of reality just take a look at a picture of an aborted baby - NOT FETUS - You will see little hands and feet fully formed, ripped off a fully formed body and covered with blood, or perhaps you will see a salt saline abortion - that
is a baby that is burned while alive in the womb and the whole
body is covered with burns and scars suffered in the most excruciating death a baby could suffer.
Fetus is a name contrived by those who choose to run from the guilt associated with abortion or those who care more for enjoying sex without responsibility than they do for the babies.
People who joke about this are so sick and perverted in their minds that they do not deserve to live. I have seen many of these photos, and those who are in the abortion industry know
the horrible truth of this. Doctors who botched abortions have
thrown babies into mop buckets in closets and left them to die unattended, and the testimony of many nurses verify this fact, and many nurses have quit doing abortions for this reason.
The news media will not print these pictures because they know that if the public should ever see them Roe v. Wade would be overturned in a heartbeat. People would storm government offices with demands that this horrible butchery stop instantly and never be allowed in this country again.
40 MILLION children have been killed since 1973 and an estimated 1 MILLION more are killed every year. If any doubt God's love and mercy on this nation and its people after you understand the terrible things we have done and this doesn't move you to action, I cannot but believe there is little hope that you ever will be moved by anything but your own desires and opinions. THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR DELIBERATE IGNORANCE!!!
2007-04-18 05:20:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The war on
TERROR- Unwinnable. We rearrange deck chairs on a sinking ship. We make more every day.
DRUGS - Unwinnable. How long has this been going on? This is just funding for cops, and paramilitary groups in foriegn countries. The DEA is on the take. Give the (free)
people what they want.
ABORTION-Unwinnable. The problem is that you can't make a woman do what she doesn't want to do. If this were 150 years ago, the do gooders from the church would make you do what they wished. With force. This is a none of your business topic. If you don't like abortion, don't get one. I don't approve, but its a free country.
WHY DO WE ALWAYS DECLARE WAR ON STUFF? THATS PRETTY STUPID.
2007-04-18 05:19:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
With the right lobbyist and the right dollar amount, the war on abortion could actually come to fruition...especially considering the current supreme court justices are anchored in favor of pro-life. It's a scary thought how people are willing to give up their rights without a fight. Under GWB, people have lost a lot of rights and no one is even batting an eye. I guess it won't matter until it affects them personally.
2007-04-18 05:06:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by glitterkittyy 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
OK, seriously, how can anything be less effective than the 'wars' on terrorism and drugs?
2007-04-18 05:06:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sun: supporting gay rights 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
trying to compare them is like trying to compare apples to oranges. All they have in common is the word "war". Not sure what you're asking about any "war" on abortion. I don't know it to be a war. Is it a "war" to save babies?
2007-04-18 05:07:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by sophieb 7
·
1⤊
1⤋