would that shut them up?
2007-04-18 05:01:48 · 48 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
do you really want them raising kids?
2007-04-18 05:31:43 · answer #1 · answered by Matthew Star 3 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I agree with Lucky...
Anti-abortion arguments rarely go farther than the pregnancy. After that the solution is "put the baby up for adooption". Which is a retarded solution, by the way. Perhaps some pro-lifers should check out some of their local orphanages so they can see the quality of life you'd be bringing a child into there. So they can be abandoned & left hanging while adoption processes take years and years.
*sigh* It's too early for an abortion debate.
2007-04-18 05:07:51 · answer #2 · answered by Winette 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Abortion vs babies found dead, source below (and those are just samples)
Everyone women had the option to give up for adoption, but they traveled to dumped the dead babies, instead of handing the baby over any police, fire station or hospital.
Abortion doesn't force these women to do that, maybe its the pro-life message or the people trying to make their point across for women who already feel bad about themselves, made to feel even worse, because of their point or message to women.
Abortion, not fully develop baby.
or
Pro-life, then decides to kill/abandoned the baby already fully developed than to give up for adoption, and then charged for murder or abandonedment charge.
I'm glad abortion is legal, otherwise there will be more stories like this or worst.
2007-04-18 06:16:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Heh, while I'm anti-abortion I don't shove my views of morality down other's throats, and I also don't agree with the ridiculously illogical/not-working abstinence programs, I'm against not providing contraception, which flies in the face of Catholicism, and on the flip side of the coin, even if I did want to adopt, the other anti-abortion fundies make it so my kind (LGBTs) can't even MARRY legally, and block adoptions for us as well at every cold hard opportunity.
Will I shut up? Not likely.
_()_
2007-04-18 05:07:49 · answer #4 · answered by vinslave 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Why can't the rich celebrities take care of them? They seem to enjoy adopting children from every other country in the world.... Why not show some patriotism & save an american baby for a change?
The anti-abortionists are not the problem. Society is the problem. When murder becomes an acceptable means to release someone from the burden of parenthood there is a BIG problem with society.
2007-04-18 05:11:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I'm anti-abortion but I'm more anti-hoe. My concern is that people keep finding themselves with these 'accidental' unwanted pregnancies in record numbers. I have 2 habitual aborters in my family and my biggest issue is with them not learning from their mistake the first time.
Everybody knows that sperm + egg = baby. What's the problem?
If I could afford it I would adopt a dozen kids. Right now I hope to be able to adopt one in the future, but I am not and will not feel compelled to be responsible for other people's disregard for human life.
2007-04-18 05:08:36 · answer #6 · answered by blazenphoenix 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Already having 2 kids and knowing what it is like to have them grow inside, this is my stand: For me personally, abortion is murder. I couldn't do it as a means of birth control.
I am honest enough to say that I may feel differently if I were pregnant as a result of rape or if carrying the baby to term would put my life in danger.
I also believe in personal rights enough to say that although it is not right for me, I will NEVER presume to tell others what is best for them by taking away their right to choose what to do with their own body.
2007-04-18 06:58:11 · answer #7 · answered by hazydaze 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
To Sister S: who says
"How many pro-choice/pro-abortion people adopt? Probably not as many as the pro-lifers" ... you just said the dumbest thing. Just because I'm pro-choice, doesn't mean that I'm going to have an abortion when I get pregnant. It means I want to choose when I want to have a family. It is a fight for women's rights - not the "quest of another murder of an innocent"- god, you come off stupid when you imply stuff like that. I hope you feel foolish.
2007-04-19 19:46:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd adopt 100 kids if I had the money to raise them. What are you willing to do? I plan on adopting once I can, I've wanted to adopt since I was a child.
To all who say that we don't care about kids once they are born are wrong! I don't have the money now, or I would. I love kids. I plan to adopt from the age of toddler on. How many pro-choice/pro-abortion people adopt? Probably not as many as the pro-lifers.
2007-04-18 05:06:08 · answer #9 · answered by sister steph 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I helped to save the live of one innocent child and further helped to raise the child,(though the mother had a boyfriend).
I was adopted my self..my biological mother,opted to give me up for adoption,before the baby killing thing became so fashionable.
I believe that the hosptials should give the parents..an 8x10 photo of the insigificant,inconsequential mass of tissue to display in their homes...as a constant reminded that they did the right thing.
2007-04-18 05:22:49 · answer #10 · answered by bonsai bobby 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Infanticide is condemned even by most "abortion rights" activists. There is no biological difference between a child born premature and its identical twin still in the womb. Yet it is illegal to kill one but not the other. Frankly, that's insane.
There is a far simpler solution to this problem.
If you don't want children, either don't have sex or USE BIRTH CONTROL.
2007-04-18 05:56:25 · answer #11 · answered by scifiguy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋