2007-04-12 18:51:06 · 6 answers · asked by missy k 1 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
pleasure wise, no difference. but the difference lies with the hygiene part. if it is uncircumcised, there has to be extra effort with keeping it clean. since there tends to be some biuld up under the skin which could smell bad if not cleaned properly. unlike if circumcised, everything is exposed already. therefore easier to clean
2007-04-12 19:04:39 · answer #1 · answered by Coolitz 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
of course it does for guys and girls both. I was circumcised in late twenties. I stay longer now . Before it was the height of pleasure now it is length. It is better for women I guess, since I can wait till they are happy.
2007-04-13 02:06:37 · answer #2 · answered by wadude 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, it does. Sex is much better with an intact man. See http://www.healthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html
But you should have figured this out by now with your hundreds of question about this topic with at least nine other identities and now 29 such questions as "missy k"
2007-04-15 17:31:04 · answer #3 · answered by Maple 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes it is different.sex is better for an uncircumcised man and for his partner.here are links to more information.
2007-04-13 04:29:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
of course not ..no difference at all...
2007-04-13 01:56:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no it doesn't
2007-04-13 01:55:45 · answer #6 · answered by yeahright 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋