English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Iraq has become destabilized. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqis are now refuges. The Sunni counter-balance to Iran has been removed, allowing Iran to become stronger than ever. Skilled professionals who have money are fleeing the country in droves. Is anyone still seriously arguing that Iraqis prefer "freedom" to stability? I realize that there are whole swaths of the country that are (relatively) stable, but since most of the population lives in areas that aren't, isn't it safe to say that the vast majority of Iraqis are now worse off than before the invasion?

2007-04-12 17:59:17 · 5 answers · asked by truth be told 3 in Politics & Government Military

5 answers

You make some valid points that would be interesting to know the answer to. But as you you say in your1st statement...."Do the soldiers in Iraq...."?

While I could give you my views of their feels since I spent 18 months in Iraq as a contractor with the DOD they would be my interpretation of their views. I will submit one thought for your consider however.

You asked in your question if anyone would still seriously argue that Iraqis prefer "freedom" to stability. I would argue they do based on my conversations with the local Iraqi people in the towns I visited.

And...honest now. As an America use "freedom" would you prefer "stability" to freedom if the tables were turned? Or would you fight to protect the freedoms you have always known?

2007-04-12 18:30:10 · answer #1 · answered by iraq51 7 · 1 0

Are you kidding with that question? As though it was their choice... They are just doing their J.O.B., following orders and trying to survive. Some, if not most, do try to contribute in a positive way, but whatever the case they are still targets and have to behave accordingly. Catch 22 maybe, but the bottom line in addressing your question is that "they" did not make the decision to go there in the first place. Their Commander in Chief did.

2007-04-12 18:43:19 · answer #2 · answered by kperry1911 3 · 0 0

Seriously, a soldier on the ground would be a fool to even try to decide what the political outcome would be. You just fight and try to stay alive. They have enough to worry about.

When I write letters to be included in packages, I never mention any of the news, just the good stuff.

2007-04-12 18:04:04 · answer #3 · answered by ScooterLibby 3 · 2 0

The evidence has shown that the secret intelligence we had became into in errors, yet that being stated I even have additionally seen evidence that Sodam Insane and his cupboard have been speaking with Al queda and have been in severe progression of WMD. They weren't as stepped forward yet as they could have liked. of course there is not any oil connection as we observed with the gas fee hike the place OPEC became into actually in charge. I even have seen interviews with leaders in Iraq who're very fascinated with this thought of democracy as against a dictatorship. it is so new to them that they do no longer understand what to do with their freedom and function made some errors and there has been bloodshed to pay for those errors. multiple the better leaders in Iraq are commencing as much as comprehend the way their economic equipment can advance and a marvelous form of of their human beings can stay below plenty extra suitable living circumstances than living below a dictatorship. the respond and this could be an underlying and advantageous motivation which could no longer be underestimated interior the area of the middle East. Allied international places ought to have leverage against an economic attack which contain a decrease off of oil from OPEC or can shelter the area from Iran or Russia with the presence of a delightful u . s . a . interior the middle East Bin weighted down is in Pakistan and obombus is making plans on entering into that territory interior the close to destiny. no count if it truly is to get bin weighted down, he's making yet another of many substantial errors as a results of fact it is going to reason a conflict with an best chum who has nuclear weapons. 4500 deaths would be miniscule to the recent loss of existence toll. We must be in touch with that area consistently from now on as a results of fact there are those in that area given the time, technologies and funds will launch extra assaults as a results of fact people who're in capacity have a loss of existence choose for usa. fortuitously, as a results of fact of those courageous squaddies who've given their lives subsequently a approaches, we've been waiting to teach our faces and our way of existence to those who've been living in darkness, propaganda and oppression so as that they might't be lead off purpose approximately what individuals are. The pursuit of existence, liberty and happiness for all...and the upkeep of. we don't choose yet another attack on our place of beginning...our adult women and men have achieved their activity honorably. God bless.

2016-12-16 04:28:25 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Why do you ask this on here?

Go to Iraq and find out.

2007-04-12 18:05:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers