Think about how easy it would be for a world grown tired of suicide bombings just to destroy the source of them? Mecca is the whole backbone of suicide bombings. If it were destroyed then the suicides would stop. Mecca is the problem. Destroy that silly rock and the suicides suddenly stop. There is no more Islam, no more radicalism, no more SEX. It's over. NO more seventy two virgins. NO more virgins. It's over. I'm sorry if this offends you people BUT you need to fix YOUR problem. Be serious. I know you won't but I wish you would.
2007-04-12 12:24:23 · 13 answers · asked by Philip D 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Mecca is not the root of the world's problems, sin is. And it is more far-reaching than mecca.
2007-04-12 12:28:58 · answer #1 · answered by beano™ 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Uh.... Mecca is not the source of bombs or suicides or religion or anything of the sort. People are. Mecca is just a town; it is inanimate. I know it's hard, but try not to confuse places with people. They're totally different things altogether.
Supposing you DID destroy Mecca, though, you would make a lot of people very, very angry. It would have precisely the opposite effect than what you seem to be expecting.
2007-04-12 12:32:45 · answer #2 · answered by Halley 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
All suicide bombers are from the Islamic community. Hence Mecca is safe. But if Mecca will have to be erased from the map at all, only the USA can do it. It would certainly devastating and bring an end to the Jihadi terrorism.
2007-04-16 02:02:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
If you were to destroy mecca, you'd see MORE suicide bombings.
Why do you think the rate of bombings and "insurgent" attacks increased after the US invaded Iraq?
Because when you kill a man's family, all he has left is the thought of revenge. And if by getting that revenge he dies in the attempt, so much the better.
Understand now?
2007-04-12 12:27:33 · answer #4 · answered by Yoda Green 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Can I imagine a world without Mecca?
I've tried and tried, but to no avail.
It didn't work for Jerusalem either.
2007-04-12 12:37:22 · answer #5 · answered by Peter D 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Your logic may be faulty.
Wouldn't destroying Jerusalem, or Washington, D.C. work the same if what you say is true?
I think you need to work on educating and influencing instead of killing and destroying as your primary means of persuasion.
2007-04-12 12:30:50 · answer #6 · answered by nora22000 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Before too long it will all be ancient history.. As we move into the age of Aquarius, the enlightenment is almost here.. All the false religions of the planet will be exposed and we will evolve into a higher form of conciseness.. Love and Light.. BB .. )O(
2007-04-12 12:50:50 · answer #7 · answered by Bunge 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. I cannot. You sound like a hateful extremist in your posts. Think about how it would be for a world to stop hating people who are different.
2007-04-12 12:28:45 · answer #8 · answered by Justsyd 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
completely incorrect muslim could replace those saudi chief with some in a position leaders who can cope with the difficulty with out this expasion and that i believe rubusmubu wahabis are significant clarification for this act
2016-10-22 00:11:52 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can imagine a world without haters of any kind. Paradise.
2007-04-12 12:29:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋