Should congress revoke tax exempt status on churches and religious organizations?

Question

If so, how huch revenue would be generated?

Answer 1

does that include rescue missions?
or the salvation army?

it might seem strange, but i have never seen an atheist one.

however I never claim my donations anyway.

Answer 2

No! Churches are non-profit organizations. The money they collect goes to aide the community, the people of the community as well as the people in the church. Churches often provide a weeks worth of food for someone in need. They often provide Christmas for children whose parents can't afford to buy anything. They help buy clothes for children that are in school, and perform other needed services in their communities. In other words the money is put back into the community except for what is used for building maintenance and to pay the Pastor, Rev., Priest, and others that work for the church. Pastors pay income tax on the paychecks they get from their church. So if churches had to pay taxes the money they collect would be double taxed. And the indigent would be worse off. Some people can't help what their circumstances are or that they need help making ends meet at times.

Answer 3

I think they should at least pay corporate income tax, unless their books show that they give away more than they take in each year.

Property taxes would be more difficult. Often, churches are built on some of the best real estate; that means their rates would be high -- perhaps high enough to bankrupt them. Local governments would have to be careful not to go that far. Nevertheless, the churches should have to pay something, either in cash or in kind.

Answer 4

the 1st replace states: Congress shall make no regulation respecting an business enterprise of religion, or prohibiting the loose exercising thereof. the government is bared from concerning itself in faith. The opposite isn't genuine. Even an casual examining of the founding fathers writing shows they seen it necessary that folk introduced their faith into government. Taxing non secular agencies is an instantaneous violation of the 1st replace. Political involvement of church homes replaced into inspired by using our founders. Jo Blo: Preachers ARE taxed comparable to all people else. they might purely decide out of Social risk-free practices and on condition that they've a ethical objection to the device. if so in addition they forfeit any money they might have gained. If I had the alternative, i might make that commerce in 5 seconds.

Answer 5

Interesting and by the same measure those who feel that the church should be taxed are also the ones who feel that church and state should be separated.

Now I am not American my self but I seem to have read something about this some where?

In true reality the true church is separate from govenment but the fake church isn't.

Answer 6

No its a Constitutional provision. Congress cant revoke tax exemptions.

Answer 7

No - we don't want governments being able to have control of religions like that. Just as not having churches control government is a big part of separation of church and state, so is not having government control churches.

Answer 8

No. Government and religion should remain separate.

In addition, churches wouldn't be able to do the work they are doing if they were levied. Not everyone may like "religionists," but they are feeding the poor here and abroad.

Answer 9

Absolutely.

It would clear out the scammers.

It would probably only generate $20-50 billion in extra taxes though.

Answer 10

No. The government should accommodate for religious perspectives. That is different than a religious establishment.