I think she should be fried, in a legal sense.
2007-04-12 10:35:51 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
While I agree she should get along time in jail, there is a legal difference between dismissing the case for lack of evidence, and having enough proof to know they are lying
2007-04-12 10:47:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Actually, the boys attorneys are moving in that direction: malicious prosecution. But it's being directed at the District Attorney's Office not the girl. His office is responsible for the charges that were leaved erroneously against the students, not her.
2007-04-12 17:42:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
She is a Druggie who can't remember yesterday.
The blame lies clearly on the DA who had no evidence to back up the accusation, but went ahead anyway
2007-04-12 18:50:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson would say white america is violating her civil rights.
2007-04-12 18:45:05 · answer #4 · answered by evil_paul 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's a case to be made that she's not in her right mind and may have been manipulated through this whole mess by the scumbag prosecutor.
2007-04-12 18:11:06 · answer #5 · answered by gunplumber_462 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
because she is a sad, pathetic young lady and the law does not wish to add to her burdens...
also, the DA does not wish to admit TOTAL defeat
he is such a self-promoting butthole...
2007-04-12 18:09:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Just because no proof that they raped her doesn't mean she was making a false statement.
2007-04-12 17:39:26 · answer #7 · answered by lashlao1 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Political correctness, she's a black female.
2007-04-12 17:40:04 · answer #8 · answered by masterplumber75 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋