The woman is the opposite polarity of man (the other side of the man/woman paradoxical creation), thus it can sometimes be scary for a man to realize that a woman can understand all that he cannot.
It is the wise man that understands the vital importance of a woman's wisdom, as being knowledge, that when combined with the man's, is complete and in unison.
2007-04-12 08:56:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
There is something incredibly annoying and irritating about a woman in a position of authority. Rare is the woman who has the grace to accept that responsibility. In the office, politics, you name it, something about women with power just brings out the beech and it's nasty.
Feminism has nothing to do with true femininity. Just look at your feminists today. Start with Hillary and work your way down, and keep going till you hit the hot place. Why do you think NOW is known as the National Organization of Witches?
2007-04-12 09:12:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Speaking as a Christian; I do not fear any human being of any
gender, because the Bible says that the "fear of man brings a
snare." This word man in the Bible means humans and is not gender specific.
The order God gave in Genesis is that the wife is to submit to the husband. It has nothing to do with gender, but with the simple fact that men generally are more logical in their decisions, and women allow emotion to affect their decisions far too much. Anyone who understands emotions knows they are far too unstable to be the basis for decision making because they are up and down all the time and rarely stable. As with every case, there are women who've learned to make decisions without relying on emotions and men who are too emotional, but anyone objective in their thinking will have to admit that these are the exceptions rather than the rule. God certainly knows what He is doing, and knew what He was doing when he put men in charge.
I am Sorry to say that there are many men who have abused this great responsibility and become dictators to their wives and children instead of loving examples of what masculinity should be. These men are more to blame for women lib movements than the women involved because they have given them the motivation by their poor representation of what real men should be.
I have to believe that the "religious people with closed minds"
label comes from a feminist (male or female) who is totally subjective in their thinking, and probably has never allowed any of the men they met to be a real man to them because their ability to see clearly is blurred by irrational prejudice toward men in general, and religious men in particular. This is understandable but not irreversible. Simple solution is: take off the blinders.
2007-04-12 09:14:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No need to single out religious people. Most people with closed minds are ruled by fear. The rest are ruled by anger.
I think it's still difficult for women to achieve positions of authority and when they have done so they have frequently had to fight tooth and nail to get there. When they do get there they have to keep up the fighting to stay there. So it should not be surprising that women in authority are 'scary'.
2007-04-12 08:56:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dharma Nature 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
I am religious, and I'm not afraid of women taking a larger role in religion. Women do, indeed, have a great deal of spiritual power, and they should feel free to exercise it. That's my personal opinion. However, my church seems to be hell-bent on keeping women in subservient roles. While I don't want to abandon my church, that's one point with which I disagree with the church's policies, and I've been fairly vocal in my opposition. As to why they're afraid, my guess is that it's either due to lifelong programming (growing up having the notion that women are subservient pounded into one's head), or a fear of sharing clerical power.
2007-04-12 08:59:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by solarius 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well its funny because in some parts of Africa they believe that the woman is the source of all existence..which I can make sense of that. Women representing the earth, and when you think about the earth it grows things, which men don't... we grow hair...that's about it. When have more power than the know I think.... women have been behind the fall of many great empires...its European culture who has made the woman second to man when really it is women who are the backbone to the evolution of humanity..
2007-04-12 09:05:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by Beam 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
You just answered your own question - closed minds. They fail to see the good that women have done and the strength that we bring to all fields, not just politics. Look back to the burning times - why did the religious folk murder all these witchen women? because they were AFRAID of us! They saw and experienced the power we possessed and rather than live alongside it, they'd rather destroy it. Really a chicken-sht way out, say I.
2007-04-12 08:59:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jylsamynne 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
all of us comprehend easily little or no about questions with reference to the shortcoming of existence of little ones/sons and daughters and the afterlife. some right here have posited a idea of an "age of duty." there is in spite of the indisputable fact that, no Scriptural foundation for that argument. actually, we do locate Scripture (as some right here have reported) that we are born into sin. the only particular factor out of little ones and their prestige before God is modern-day in I Corinthians 7:14, "For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by using the spouse, and the unbelieving spouse is sanctified by using the husband: else were your little ones unclean; yet now are they holy." As became reported in an before put up, King David had the wish that he ought to work out his lifeless newborn lower back, "I shall bypass to him, yet he shall no longer go back to me." in II Samuel 12:33. in spite of this verse, we can't say with truth what occurs to a stillborn, miscarried, or aborted toddler. What we would want to then come to is an awareness of God's personality. God is genuinely sturdy. he's the Righteous decide. no individual, at the same time as status before His throne on Judgment Day, will be in a position to assert to Him, "it really is not any longer honest!" All will well known that His strategies are only and proper.
2016-11-23 15:17:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
actually it has nothing to do with religion. in the christian religion it never says they are inferior in fact it says that you should respect them since they were supposed to be in charge of what goes on at home. and not looking at women and seperating them from men in muslim culture is out of respect. the problem is that sexist people tend get into power in religious communities and then they try to influence others opinions. and then those feminists who want to empower women by putting down men use it as soapbox to degrade religion causing normally non-sexist males to become offended and start degrading women in general.
2007-04-12 09:38:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by FengHuaXueYue 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Feminine principles are all about self. To be a woman does not mean they are powerless or less than man. Its when you try to push for those principles that you become all about self.
2007-04-12 08:58:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Fish <>< 7
·
3⤊
0⤋