2007-04-12 00:23:40 · 13 answers · asked by leo g 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
What heritage? Jesus, if he existed, was just another guy. If he had a kid, it would just be another dot in the gene pool at this point.
The stuff written about Jesus was written decades after Jesus purportedly died. The claims of his heritage were made up to convince others that he was of one line or another (or both, though that doesn't make sense). There is no evidence that he came from anywhere special.
There's also no way for anybody today to show relations to Jesus without some new discovery that could provide documentation and genetic material.
Jesus wasn't important enough in his day for anybody to notice him. There's hardly any contemporary mention of him, and those that are claimed to exist are dubious. His name only lived on at all because some of his follower's followers made up stories about him long after he died.
2007-04-12 00:27:08 · answer #1 · answered by nondescript 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
some of these question is so easy that a 1st grade child can answer them, Jesus DID NOT have ANY children, The only thing Jesus will have is a bride, that will be with him at the marriage supper, & then come back on theis earth to rule & reign for 1000 yrs. Do you think it is about time young people & grown ups can ask a very simple question, I don't think so base upon What I have read from many.
2007-04-12 07:34:13 · answer #2 · answered by birdsflies 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Christianity was the ultimate product of religious syncretism in the ancient world. Its emergence owed nothing to a holy carpenter. There were many Jesuses but the fable was a cultural construct. Nazareth did not exist in the 1st century AD – the area was a burial ground of rock-cut tombs. Following a star would lead you in circles. The 12 disciples are as fictitious as their master, invented to legitimise the claims of the early churches. The original Mary was not a virgin. That idea was borrowed from pagan goddesses."
2007-04-12 07:58:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good question.
There is some evidence to suggest that Jesus and his wife Mary Magdalene had three children (oldest to youngest) being: Mary, James (Judas) and Sara.
The only bloodline to have survived was the one that returned to the source of the Lion of Judah, the true remaining descendents of David, the "Divine Holy Ones" of Ireland, the Cuilleain (also known as Cullen, Cualan etc).
Princess Tamar Tephi married into this line around 580 BCE after being saved as the only surviving bloodline of King Zedekiah thanks to Jeremiah.
The French via the "DaVinci Code" myth claim that Sara somehow survived, but all evidence suggests this is false.
The only royal bloodline to hold any historical credibility is the British, who for centuries stole the Stone of Destiny, the Lion of Judah for their own coat of arms after finishing the complete demolition of Ireland.
Do they know their heritage? Some do, some don't.
See:
http://www.ucadia.com/frank/frank_history_grail.htm
2007-04-12 07:27:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
He wasn't married when he started his ministry and he also knew he was there to die so I wouldn't think he would do that.. He cam to give his life not to have a life of his own.
Question for you...if you had a gf/bf but you knew you wouldn't live long would you marry that person and have a child with them? Probably not...if your a decent human being that is. Neither would Christ.
2007-04-12 07:41:13 · answer #5 · answered by † H20andspirit 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, He didn't have children. And He wasn't married to Mary Magdelene or anyone else. That wasn't His purpose in life. He was sent by His Father to minister for 3 years and then to die on the Cross for our sins so that we might have eternal life.
2007-04-12 07:37:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If he had a child, his bloodline would be near impossible to prove. It's a lot of work just tracing family back to the 1800's.
2007-04-12 07:36:29 · answer #7 · answered by liberpez 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i'm inclined to think that he had children. he was a man after all, and men have certain needs in life that only a woman can fulfil, so it was likely (but not definite) that he had offspring.
as far as lineage, i don't know mine from 2000 years back, and i don't think most people do either, so i would conclude that his living descendants (if any) have no clue
2007-04-12 07:31:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
no
Jesus had no physical children
regardless of what Dan Brown in Da Vinch Dat Stole Easter claims
2007-04-12 07:29:57 · answer #9 · answered by whirlingmerc 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If he had, his line might have completely died out anyway. If he had children, there's no way of knowing whether he has any descendants alive today, and I doubt that they would know he was their ancestor
2007-04-12 07:30:58 · answer #10 · answered by murnip 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋