A creation must be tested to see if it is worthy. A expression is more like art, the beauty is in the eye of the beholder. One may ask, an expression or creation of what? One must divine being to know the answer. And what eye am I talking about?
2007-04-09 15:22:51 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I am a friend and a brother, Cosmicdrifter.
In those terms, I am a creative expression that is worthy in the eyes of the one being that is beholding the answer. *cartwheels*
2007-04-09 15:41:58 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I am both a creation and an expression. You don't know much about the creative process if you don't understand that the creation IS the expression of the mind behind it.
Any craftsman can tell you that.
2007-04-09 16:20:36 · answer #2 · answered by anna 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why is art not tested to see if it is worthy? Worthy of what? Worthy of being art? Of representing art? Worthy of reflecting the true meaning of art? Thus what is creation tested as? To be worthy of what? Worthy of being created? It exists therefore it is worthy of existence? What is worthy of existence? Disease? Animals? Man? God? If God's purpose is to judge what is worthy of existence and God created all existence then God judges Her own work and that is non-subjective. So how can we believe in a non-subjective God? Truth is only from God's opinion? That belays Freewill. However, if God gave Man Freewill, how can Freewill be objective since Man had no choice whether to 'chose' Freewill? Freewill was forced upon Man by God thus negating the definition of 'Freewill'. QED.
2007-04-09 15:34:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think I am the expression of a thought in creation.
2007-04-09 19:41:07 · answer #4 · answered by James 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe anything is ultimately created. In your words, I believe the reality we see is an expression of mathematics ( necessary tautological logical truth ). We observe that nature obeys simple mathematical laws to incredible accuracy. The apparent isomorphism we see between mathematics and reality, is an indication to me that what ulimately exists is mathematics which appears to look like space/time/mass/energy because only those expressions of mathematics which appear to be mass/energy/space/time contain observers such as ourselves.
2007-04-09 15:28:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
expression in the begining but now i am the controller of expression in creation
2007-04-10 21:09:27 · answer #6 · answered by KrishanRam(Jitendra k) 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am an expression (one ' interpretation ' ) of that creation.
What ' eye ' are you talking about ? . . . The eye being the soul of the other that is observing you..
.
2007-04-10 06:07:23 · answer #7 · answered by onelight 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
All your terminologies are meaningless, as nobody knows the answer to how we got here. I believe we were created by God, but my belief doesn't prove anything...nor is anybody else's theories and faiths.
2007-04-09 15:34:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I, like everything in the universe, am a part of the process, neither distinct nor unique.
2007-04-09 15:28:16 · answer #9 · answered by NHBaritone 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
An expression of course.
I'm architect.
2007-04-09 15:26:34 · answer #10 · answered by Lost. at. Sea. 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋