English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

In October 2006, the U.S. population reached 300 million. Is a population of this size sustainable in the long term? If not, what population size would be sustainable and why?

2007-04-09 12:32:30 · 4 answers · asked by fwerds 2 in Environment

4 answers

I've seen this prompt before. It's like some scholarship essay. Well, maybe not in your case. But, you know.

2007-04-09 12:36:13 · answer #1 · answered by xdayzedpnaii 3 · 0 1

Well that is the question ea some people would say that it is other would say that 300 million is way too much it all depends. My opion is that when humans can get there population to peak and stay there then we are sustainable.

2007-04-09 19:41:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

300 million is sustainable because we are sustaining it now. People who say we cannot continue to do so indefinitely will be proven wrong when it reaches 600 million and keeps growing.

2007-04-09 21:29:35 · answer #3 · answered by campbelp2002 7 · 1 0

immigration and kids being born to people who cannott care for them is killing us, making the globe hotter.

2007-04-09 19:40:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers