Big Bang theory all the way! And I'm from the South. Shocking, eh?
2007-04-09 10:21:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Scientists use light to see if parts of the universe are moving away from us, or moving towards. And so far everything has been moving away from us meaning the universe is expanding. Therefore it can be assumed that it was at one point condensed. Now creationism sort of also makes sense, because Mr. Huge Answer gave a good point. Energy can't be created or destroyed...So how did this all come to be? I like evolution and the Big Bang theory, and if you take black holes into consideration, making something out of nothing actually makes sense. (Black hole grows too heavy and breaks away from universe, is suspended in nothingness, and then explodes creating another universe.) But this doesn't explain the creation of the first universe.
2007-04-09 10:42:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by abacus314 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no proof that any God did anything unless you accept that a God created the Mass and energy that caused the Big Bang. I would think it would be insulting to such a God if you would not believe that the God would know enough to perceive that the Big Bang began evolution. The God would also know the paths of evolution of every mote of that big Bang. Including the Earth and human beings amongst everything else in the universe.
Why do Christians underrate a God just to have a parable in a book accepted as a true happening?
If you want the Truth......Ask a Pagan.
2007-04-09 10:22:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Terry 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
There is no "Creation Theory". In order to be a theory, it would have to make testable predictions that are confirmed by observation.
There is plenty of evidence for the big bang, galactic red shifts and the microwave background first and foremost.
2007-04-09 10:24:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by novangelis 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Creationism
2007-04-09 10:22:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by German 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Law of Thermodynamics says that energy cannot be created, it only changes in form. You cannot have a self-winding watch, and since entropy shows that the universe is "winding down" something had to "wind it up".
In regard to the Creation Theory, well, for me, math has to be the deciding factor. Mathematical probability, as given by Hoyle, states that the chances of life to spontaneously evolve out of a primordial soup is one in 10 to the 40,000 power. Now scientists agree that anything beyond one in 10 to the 50th power is consider an impossibility. So imagine adding 39,950 more zeros onto those odds!
Can we use math in proving the existence of God? Actually, yes we can. God has provided the proof through prophecy. No other "holy book" can provide prophecy beside the Bible, and it is the Bible that declares a Creator God. Prophecy traces the origin of the Bible to being outside of our physical time domain. It reads in Isaiah 41:22-23,
"Let them bring forth and show us what will happen; let them show the former things, what they were, that we may consider them, and know the latter end of them; or declare to us things to come. Show the things that are to come hereafter, that we may know that you are gods; yes, do good or do evil, that we may be dismayed and see it together."
So, let's look at this mathematically. Dr. Peter Stoner (in an analysis that was carefully reviewed and pronounced to be sound by the American Scientific Affiliation) states that the probability of just eight prophecies being fulfilled in just one person is 1 in 10 to the 17th power. However, Jesus fulfilled 300 specific prophecies. A few of which I have documented here...
http://www.schneblin.com/studies/pdfs/in_the_volume_of_the_book.pdf
This is not even including the incredibly detailed prophecy regarding the regathering of Israel, the rise of Alexander the Great and later Ptolemy in the book of Daniel, and much, much more.
So, mathematically, the odds are in overwhelming favor of the Creator God written in the pages of the Bible rather than in the overwhelming odds against evolution or a Big Bang.
2007-04-09 10:22:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
I believe in the big bang. And, Schnebb, any books you want to find a prophecy, there is one. In Moby Dick or the Old man and the sea people found a prophecy. Does that mean we should use those books as holy objects?
2007-04-09 10:24:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Scientists can only prove Reaction. But for every Reaction there in in fact an Action. Creation points to the Action that started off this series of Reactions etc.
As a logical creature, I would never look at my television set and say...'look how my tv has evolved from nothing.'
2007-04-09 10:23:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Starjumper the R&S Cow 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Creation... theory? Uh... Creationism is a guess. It doesn't even qualify as an EDUCATED guess (hypothesis) let alone a theory.
Count me in for Big Bang theory.
2007-04-09 10:30:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Big Bang.
2007-04-09 10:22:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by swordarkeereon 6
·
0⤊
0⤋