This is their attempt to meld science and religion. Esentially to try and dominate it as they do so many other things. Pffffft!!! That's like attempting to put a bowling ball through a needle's eye. ABSURD!
2007-04-09 06:35:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Pontius 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Since they are both supposedly 'theories', it's pretty easy to mix them together. Some people don't take the word of the Bible literally or believe that the Bible may have left out a few things which weren't really relevant at the time and are ultimately unimportant in the long run. They may think of God creating Adam from a pile of dirt as a way of saying that humans came from the earth, as if God's creation was evolution. Of course, the Bible doesn't mention 'monkeys' but there's the whole thing about how God created the world in 6 days, but a day in God's eyes may have been millions or billions of years to us. Some people believe that can explain the time before man, when the earth was taking the form of how we know it today.
Other people just block it out and somehow believe in both without thinking about it. My mom admitted she believes in Adam and Eve but she also believes the Big Bang theory which she thinks was God's doing. Personally, I just try not to worry about it.
2007-04-09 06:41:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Pico 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you believe in fundamentalism and the literal meaning of the Bible, then no, evolution and creationism cannot co-exist. Both are fairly narrow-minded views of progress of the world, and neither may be the right one. But there are things like fossils that prove some form of evolution. Creationists could say God planted the fossils there, but there is no reason for Him (or Her) doing that. Evolution exists, but not with Creationism. You can believe God guided evolution and directed the path towards man, but that is not Genesis. This may or may not be true, but it is what I think.
2007-04-09 06:38:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kyris 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
actually they do. If you are talking about the "original" theory of evolution, not the one Atheist have tried to push. The theory of evolution has nothing to do with man from ape. That was taken out of context from an example cited.
The best example of evolution and creationism is the growth of the human being.
We start off as 2 seperate entities. The egg and the sperm. They collide ( big bang theory, lol), then new life if formed. Over the next few months it changes, evolves and adapts. Then birth. Over time we go from small helpless baby, to sitting, crawling, walking, talking, developing and evolving into adults. We continue to evolve (age) until our demise and we move onto the next level. Ie..heaven etc..
This is all evolution. Evolution is simply change and adaptation for survival of the species. We go from basically 2 fluids to a full human.
2007-04-09 06:39:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Chrissy 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Every educated people believe in "micro-evolution".
No christian believes in evolution that takes place without God.
Basically changes happen under the provision of God. As choices are made so are they willed by Him.
If after many years humans started to run 30 mph, God willed the bulkier legs to do so but humans will not become a horse.
2007-04-09 07:09:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by AJHL 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
^ no, creationism is maximum probable no longer a idea. At best, it really is an untestable hypothesis. Evolution isn't a conception, it really is a lot of information with no longer something contradicting it. you do not 'trust' in evolution, you're both knowledgeable sufficient about evolution that you're conscious of it, or you do not are conscious of it. in case you may favor to insert a metaphysical framework round evolution and say that god guided it or regardless of, it truly is your element. yet evolution is authentic technology, no longer metaphysics and under no circumstances a conception. Gundamboy stated "many human beings both go with to trust one or the different, so there'll continuously be a warm debate between both." No, there gained't continuously be a debate. contained in the destiny, human beings will imagine the actual incontrovertible actuality that we are really having a debate about that's as stupid as we imagine it replaced into for human beings to really have a debate that the sunlight revolved around the earth. definite, you could trust that god guided evolution. My question is that this: is it fairly a threat to trust the writing of Genesis replaced into in simple terms a metaphor, and nonetheless be a christian? in case you settle for that a number of the bible replaced into in simple terms a metaphor, then how do you determine what aspects? Why no longer the completed element? per chance the completed idea of god and heaven and hell replaced into in simple terms a metaphor to allow you to know to stay a fantastic life. So yeah, human beings do trust in both. i don't think of those human beings are being intellectually truthful with themselves although. finding out on and finding out on what aspects of the bible are genuine and what aspects are metaphors with none concrete source to coaching guide you isn't a valid practice.
2016-11-27 22:00:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by angele 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Basically, Darwin was brilliant to note that God created life to evolve, thus forming his own "Theory of Evolution". Life was already evolving before Darwin. I guess that no one else thought about explaining how it happened, so Darwin came up with his theory.
Oh, and if it's still a theory, it means it ISN'T PROVEN! So only people who lack understanding what the meaning of "theory" and :"law" as stated by the scientific society think that Darwin's theory is fact. Last thing. God created evolution. If mankind could fully understand and explain it, where would God be?
2007-04-09 06:36:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Legendary_Slacker 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
I can see why some would say that. They hold fast to their religion, yet don't want to discredit ideas that actually have reasoning behind them. I would assume they are not necessarily referring to creation as in the Biblical account, but rather as a creator setting life in motion, which would leave room for evolution.
2007-04-09 06:33:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by KS 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Because only fringe antisecularists think otherwise. Obviously, not everyone is a fringe antisecularist.
Edit: Anyone who says evolution is "just a theory" does not understand evolution or what a theory is in science.
2007-04-09 06:31:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by LabGrrl 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Evolution exists, as in adaptations to environment challenges, but as to the origins of life - no one knows for certain and it is beyond our comprehension which makes it a futile argument at best.
2007-04-09 06:35:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by GDBear 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Evolution doesn't say anything about a creator except the Christian creator as related in Genesis. Belief in a God is compatible with evolution.
2007-04-09 06:31:17
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋