No, he did have excellent sunblock
2007-04-09 03:44:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Experto Credo 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nobody who knew him ever described him or made a drawing or painting of him. We have no idea what kind of hair he had, whether he was short or tall, did he have a little button nose or one like a banana ?
You say he had blue eyes, but this is two thousand years later. Most of the pictures that we see of Jesus were painted by Italian and Dutch painters about fifteen hundred years after Jesus was reduced to dust. The images are out of their imaginations.
2007-04-09 03:38:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No no no, I'm white with blonde/ blue features and I try to avoid the sunburns, but God in the Flesh was more than likely an olive toned, dark haired, dark eyed Jew. Probably not much different from Jews today. You'll sho nuff find out yourself when he returns...........
2007-04-09 03:37:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by Eye of Innocence 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Although I know you are trying to be funny, I do understand what you are saying.
Jesus was from the middle eastern part of our planet and that would make it likely that he was not blonde, blue eyed etc. As people have not ever even been given a physical description of Jesus and obviously have never seen a picture of him, they portray him in their own image etc.
And, you will have to admit that this wonderfully fine featured blue eyed man makes a great image on the big screen for those of us who would see him like that. Hollywood isn't stupid...or not that stupid. The most well known painting in the world is probably the "last supper" images. It seems odd to me that anyone with any sense at all would know that the artist did not actually see any of the men portrayed in that painting yet a great deal has been said or written about this diciple or that diciple looking feminine or whatever. Like I said, we place our own image on them. The same thing holds true for paintings and statues in churches. No one knows what Jesus looked like or Mary looked like or any of the saints looked like yet their image is there for all the world to see. Again, our image.
I believe in Jesus with all my heart and yes, I guess when I picture him I see him in my own eyes etc. but I also know that it is his spirit that is important...not his physical body.
2007-04-09 03:33:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by Poohcat1 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jesus was not white for one. A lot of archaeologist have even compared Jesus' lineage to that of the pharoah Osiris. All the pharoahs were black and so was Jesus. There is also a book called the History of Genes that says white people were made from Black people which meant Black people were on earth before White people. Jesus is only shown to be white because white people depict him on most of the art and they wouldn't want to be worshipping a Black person.
2007-04-12 00:12:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by lisha 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jesus was portraited this way by European painters which only knew blond people w/ blue eyes. And in a Jew hatred environment. Probably Jesus was dark skinned like an Mediterranean, w/ black eyes and black hair.
2007-04-09 03:41:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by M.M.D.C. 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't believe that he had blond hair and blue eyes. I don't know why artists always paint him that way. Although I am half-Jewish with blond hair and blue eyes (and I sunburn like you wouldn't believe), I don't think many Jewish people were blond back then.
2007-04-09 03:41:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Cylon Betty 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jesus was 1)a Jew and 2) lived in an area where everybody was tan and dark haired.
we have no record of having any physical descriptions of Him.
i don't know where you got blond hair and blue eyes.
2007-04-09 03:39:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jesus=Savior<3 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jesus's blond hair and blue eyes is a representation in pictures and done just to make western europeans identify with him. If he existed, he is more likely to have had a middle eastern look.
2007-04-09 03:31:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by the_emrod 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jesus is white with blonde hair and blue eyes? According to whom? Not according to me!
2007-04-09 03:36:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've never heard that one. I don't think anyone actually knows what He looked like. According to what was written in ancient transcripts he was not an attractive man and he had brown hair and brown eyes. Are you assuming he has blonde hair and blue eyes because he was hebrew?
2007-04-09 03:32:32
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋