English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

with the hijackers? Maybe she could have persuaded the terrorists to crash into a different target, after they landed and dropped her off.

2007-04-09 01:44:43 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

12 answers

Somehow, I'm loving all this bashing. And I'm a born-and-raised Californian. (Please pray for me....)

2007-04-09 02:02:40 · answer #1 · answered by ron w 4 · 4 0

You folks who somehow think that there is something wrong with Congres providing oversight for the military need to go back and read your Constitutions.

If you want to use past precedence as a benchmark, look at the way that the Republican House of Representatives was run by the draft-dodging chickenhawk coward who thinks that men should be out hunting girafes and women can't fight because they get infections Newt Gingrich as an example. Congress second-guessed EVERYTHING that Clinton did in regard to the military....

2007-04-09 02:37:12 · answer #2 · answered by Robert N 4 · 0 2

Ms. Pelosi does seem to want to curry favor with Muslims.

Ms. Pelosi could be helping terrorists in a deadly way by supporting the "nuclear fuel bank" without understanding that Iran has the capability of futher enriching "nuclear fuel" to make it pure enough (U235) to provide material for a nuclear bomb.

On April 10, 2997, an article written by Carla Mariunucci appeared in the San Francisco Chronicle, indicating that Ms. Pelosi and Rep. Lantos are interested in making a "diplomatic trip" to Iran.
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/04/10/BAGV9P6C0S6.DTL
Pelosi, Lantos may be interested in diplomatic trip to Iran
Furthermore, the article quoted Rep Lantos as saying that he co-sponsored legislation with Ms. Pelosi which could pass as early as May that calls for making available to all countries --including Iran -- nuclear fuel for peaceful purposes under international oversight by establishing a "nuclear fuel bank".

I believe that the legislation is:
HR 6 Clean Energy Act of 2007
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=110_cong_bills&docid=f:h6ih.txt.pdf

Those who advocate the "nuclear fuel bank" consider that clean nuclear technology would be available to all countries. However, those who argue against the "nuclear fuel bank" point out that the uranium enrichment process (using centrifuges to separate isotopes as in the FEP at Natanz, Iran) can also be used to produce a more pure grade of uranium 235 which may be used in a nuclear bomb.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4416482.stm
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/09/28/opinion/edbuffett.php
http://www.goodharborreport.com/node/295

The head of the Iranian Nuclear Energy Organization, Gholam-Reza Aghazadeh, explains it thus:
The simple way is to inject 0.7% (uranium) and obtain 3.5%, right? Now, if you take this 3.5% and inject it again into the chain (of centrifuges), the result will be 20%. If you inject the 20% back into the chain, the result will be 60%. If you inject this 60%, the result will be 90%.
http://www.memritv.org/Transcript.asp?P1=1120
http://www.memritv.org/Search.asp?ACT=S6&P1=2,148&P3=4

Since Iran has uranium enrichment capabilities at its FEP (fuel enrichment plant) at Natanz, giving Iran nuclear "fuel" enriched to 3.5% might not be a good idea if Iran does have the agenda to develop a nuclear bomb.

The BBC article (listed below) describes the nuclear fuel process.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/sci_nat/05/nuclear_fuel/html/mining.stm

2007-04-11 10:22:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Except you forget the Elite, don't mingle with the Common
Voters she only flys in her Private Jet.

2007-04-09 01:52:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Don't be silly, the terrorists never learned how to land a plane.

2007-04-09 01:52:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 6 2

Wow, this coming from a party that turned the 9/11 (repub) sympathy into world hatred for us...

2007-04-09 01:50:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 5

Even though I personally don't care for her politics--I doubt it. It would have been a real eye opening experience for her though.

2007-04-09 01:50:29 · answer #7 · answered by aiminhigh24u2 6 · 2 3

if the Stupid States of America would control its own borders

that flight would have never been hijacked

2007-04-09 02:12:26 · answer #8 · answered by rattle katttle 1 · 0 5

I always enjoy a joke that makes fun about an event that killed brave Americas.

Here..... ha, ha, ha,ha

NOW ARE YOU HAPPY?

2007-04-09 02:09:14 · answer #9 · answered by iraq51 7 · 0 4

see the film on my webpage

2007-04-09 01:48:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 7

fedest.com, questions and answers