YES!!!!!!
2007-03-25 23:25:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
This depends greatly on the type of exposure. The risk is, of course, much greater if the same needle is being used repeatedly by mutliple HIV+ individuals before you do. From the healthcare research standpoint, I can tell you that if a hollow-bore needle (as opposed to a sewing or suturing needle) enters a blood vessel of a KNOWN HIV + patient and then accidentally sticks you, you're risk of contracting HIV is approximately 0.3% (1 in 300). If blood from an HIV+ patient splashes you in the eye or mouth, it is approximately 0.1% (1 in 1000). This is based on accidental needlestick exposure, not passing on and using a needle from one heroin addict to another, but your question doesn't make it clear if by "injection needle" you mean that, or the needles used to inject medications in an emergency department, for example. If it is the latter, as you can see, the risk is far from "100%", as one of the answers suggests. Still, patients who come to me after needlestick exposure are some of the most terrified patients I have to deal with, so stay safe and be careful. And if you are indeed talking about sharing needles between addicts, then you are much, much more likely to contract HIV and Hepatitis B and/or C. As far as I know, there are no statistics on this situation, though.
2007-03-26 02:45:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by XxerdocxX 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think you are not listening or watching National radio or TV channels. They advertise all the news about AIDS several times. AIDS spread through blood contacts also.
Hence, there is a chance of spreading AIDS by reused needle which is already used by a person with AIDS.
2007-03-26 00:31:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ravi 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't have a lot of knowledge on this subject, I am sure no one should share needle's especially one that has been used by a person with aids. I think this is one of the main reasons aids spreads amongst people using needles.
If you have any doubts then go on the web and address this point.
Regards
Dawn
2007-03-25 23:34:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by dawnybloom 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Using previously contaminated hypodermic needles or other "works" to divide a drug solution among drug injection partners can spread HIV. Studies in the early- and mid-1980s focused only on sharing needles, but studies beginning in the late-1980s have shown that this message can lead to increased HIV risk of infection because they fail to highlight the risks of infection from sharing the same prep equipment, not just the needles themselves.
2007-03-25 23:40:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
YES.
But there are degrees of exposure depending on the size of the bore of the needle and they are handled differently.
For example the percentage of exposure with a 20 inch guage needle is different from the percentage of exposure from a 12inch guage needle.
We also consider how the needle was used by the HIV positive person.
For example the risks vary from someone who used it for a direct injection into a blood vessel and someone who used it for a regular intra-muscular injection.
2007-03-26 07:28:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by emanzit 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I understand what you assert yet no, the Catholic Church isn't in charge for the unfold of AIDS. all of us understand that AIDS is unfold by potential of touch with contaminated human beings, no remember if this is sexual touch, needles or blood transfusions. which you're able to answer your question this is those 3 issues that are in charge for the unfold of AIDS. learn tutor that handing out condoms promotes unstable sexual habit which no longer purely places human beings in possibility for AIDS, yet different risky illnesses besides. And why would the Catholic Church desire to sell immoral habit while God instructions that we sell chastity? In countries like Uganda the place abstinence classes are used relatively than condom distribution the achievement rates in reducing AIDS are plenty greater. Why? because of fact this is greater smart to sell a transformation in habit relatively than merely merely take care of the "symptom" by potential of handing out condoms. the fewer human beings there are beautiful in unstable behaviors, the fewer we would have new circumstances of AIDS. So if reality be instructed the Catholic Church (and different entities international) are literally assisting greater to end the unfold of AIDS. Aleria's answer above is suitable on objective! Pax Vobiscum+
2016-12-19 14:03:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes,of course. The used needle should never be reused.
2007-03-26 08:44:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Santu 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes that is one of the most proven ways in which AIDS may spread from one person to another.
2007-03-25 23:34:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by sinha 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes it will because the best and easiest transmittor of AIDS is through a used needle. that is why nurses and doctors make it a point to discard needles in a safe container after use and they do not sterilize used needles. they are also very careful not to get pricked.
2007-03-25 23:35:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by denisse rayne 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Of course thre are definite chances by this rout but chances are less than 5%. The main sourses are no.1 HIV infected blood transfusion 2nd commen sexual intercourse(without condome) with infected person Note; in this catagoury homosexual are more prone to be infected.
2007-03-26 05:09:48
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋