No real difference between them. They're all insane.
2007-03-25 18:45:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by God 6
·
2⤊
6⤋
i'm uncertain why you're attempting to physique the controversy in this variety of vogue as to call people who disagree with gay marriage "traumatic." regrettably, it extremely is an all-too-consumer-friendly tactic with regard to the gay political schedule -- all and sundry who disagrees with them on something is branded "traumatic" or something comparable. it extremely is why they made up a venture, regularly consumer-friendly as homophobia, that would not even exist. the better social concern right it extremely isn't gay marriage. the priority is in spite of if or no longer activist judges can impose their will on the folk even while the folk have voted democratically on something. In a democracy, judges don't have that potential -- yet curiously, too lots of them think of they do. the folk have replied with a convincing "no" in each state the place legalized gay marriage has been positioned to a vote -- even in Oregon, between the main liberal states interior america of a. This proposed modification is approximately holding the folk's precise to verify such ethical questions, with out activist judges brushing that precise aside with the help of legislating from the bench and pushing their very own very own perspectives on us. This proposed modification is going way previous gay marriage. that's a controversy of holding the democratic technique from ideology-pushed adult adult males and females in black robes.
2016-10-20 11:31:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by leong 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
A fundamental christian has the bible "The word of god" as his weapon and the jew has the tora "the word of god as his weapon" Figure out the rest.
2007-03-25 19:15:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
To answer the title question: I wouldn't consider GWB a fundamental anything, except for fundamentally uninformed and fundamentally overpowered.
2007-03-25 18:45:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Kate S 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
King George is not intelligent enough to know whether his beliefs are fundamental or not.
2007-03-25 18:47:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
do christians murder others ? i would hope not, the crusades happened yes, by catholics. all christians are not catholic. i would say bush is not christian.
Jews live by the old testament, a fundamentalist christian would live by both, with a nover riding thought on the new testament, since it does correct some of the behaviors of the old testament.
2007-03-25 18:48:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
No. I don't even consider him a Christian. He bespeaks of Xianity when it is to his convenience. No one as dishonest and manipulative as Bush could possibly be Christian.
His sins far outreach those of the 'fallen' evangelists such as Baker, Falwell and their ilk.
2007-03-25 18:47:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by CevnLDSNewbie 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
Of coarse. He is every kind of Christian, He once said he talks and gets advice from Jesus.
2007-03-25 18:45:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
yes, he is.
Jews don't believe in a lot of things Christians do. Like a hell of eternal fire, or a "personal relationship" with God, just to give two examples.
2007-03-25 18:45:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Skippy 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
There are only two kinds of human beings the ones washed in the blood of Jesus on their way to heaven and the ones who are not washed in the blood of Jesus and are heading for hell. Every person in the world falls into one of these two catagories. THAT'S IT.
2007-03-25 18:49:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by wisdom 4
·
3⤊
4⤋
Ha! I wish! George W isn't conservative nor Christian enough in my book.
He signed RDU 90 into law.
He called Allah and God one and the same.
2007-03-25 18:44:03
·
answer #11
·
answered by Last Ent Wife (RCIA) 7
·
3⤊
3⤋