I don't consider it hunting. I call it trapping and shooting. And I don't believe in it. The deer use the same trails (as they do in the wild) so the owner knows their routes. They set a man that paid a pretty penny in a stand and when the deer comes by, they shoot it.
Big money scam if you ask me.
2007-03-26 06:03:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by windandwater 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Even open land is "fenced" off eventually in one way or another. But I agree, I don't think fenced hunts are very ethical. I personally don't even think the use of deer feeders is ethical but that's just me. I think if we're going to take that animal's life then it is our responsibility to give it fair chase and provide an ethical kill. If you're starving to death then that's a different story. But were in modern times. There's no need for fenced hunts. We're sportsman.
2007-03-26 00:42:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm a hunter, and I think it's unethical, this may stir the pot, but I also think baiting is unethical. The young lady above me who wrote that it's for the rich *****'s is right! These are the same ones who have museum quality parker shotguns and take them to the field for clays( I've actually seen this, he reduced the price of the shotgun by over 50,000 dollars with the first shot, it was no longer new and unfired)
2007-03-26 11:58:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by boker_magnum 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think that it is for rich f******s that want to kill a trophy deer, who are too lazy and good to actually do their own scouting and hunting.
2007-03-26 07:10:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sweetteach 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
i guss its for some rich city guy who has no idea how to hunt
2007-03-26 13:36:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by chad s 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i dont see the challenge in it myself,kind of like shooting fish in a barrel.not very sportsman like at all.good luck.
2007-03-26 00:42:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by dixie58 7
·
0⤊
0⤋