Can an officer search a parked vehicle on private property without warrent or probably cause?

Question

add-on to indecent exposure question

Answer 1

The Fourth Amendment provides that the people shall be protected from unreasonable search and seizures, without a valid warrant.

A search/seizure may be found reasonable, if there is probable cause to make the search/seizure, i.e. suspicious activity.

The cop can look-in on the vehicle through the window of the vehicle, since there is no "expectation of privacy" in the vehicle.

Once the cop sees there is criminal activity afoot, he may have enough probable cause to search the vehicle without a valid warrant.

Answer 2

It depends, not many officers will just randomly walk up to a vehicle and look through it, there HAD to be something that cause him to do it (judging rom your questions, I can guess what was going on). And thus, seeing a parked vehicle bouncing and moving like that, a number of things could be taking place, and he would have probable cause to search the vehicle. For all he knew a person could be being beaten to death or sexually assaulted in the vehcile, it is is duty to investigate.

Answer 3

Short answer is no. But that means the car was just sitting there.
I suspect if you and your honey were naked in the car, there was probably some "movement" going on.
So the passing cop sees that. He does not know if there is a rape in progress, some clumsy thief trying to steal the car, or just some innocent "slap and tickle" going on. He has probable cause because the car is moving or jumping (depending on your exuberance). It is also a suspicious circumstance that he is required to investigate.
It's a misdemeanor beef, pay the fine.

Answer 4

Probable cause is very easy for an officer to claim. If he saw movement in the car that looked suspicious he'll claim he was checking to make sure your car wasn't being stolen. IT will be easy if it was dark or rainy, etc.

If a neighbor called or anyone in the neighborhood reported ANYTHING suspicious and he was resonding to that call, he can claim that's why he checked it.

Answer 5

The reasoning in the back of the universe requiring a reason is the organic regulations of Causality. each and every thing would desire to come from some thing. I argue nonetheless, that utilising organic good judgment, God does not want a writer. evaluate right here: Inherent in the belief of "god" (and in specific, the Abrahamic God), is the view that God created each and every thing in our universe. till now God, there grew to become into purely chaos, till God spoke and delivered order to it. He created all that's in it, and governs each and every particle, each and every regulation, and each medical theory. subsequently, via its very definition, God exists independently of its introduction. for the reason that Causality is a organic rule, and we now have commonplace that God (if it exists) exists independently of those organic policies, then Causality does not practice to him. a similar would be unable to be reported for the universe. The universe is definite via its regulations and organic strategies, so as because of the fact of this each and every thing in the universe has to return from some thing. the only thank you to ward off that's to signify that for the period of a few unspecified time sooner or later in the classic previous of the universe, the organic policies at one factor did not exist or artwork comparable to they do now. that may not specific Pleading, this is organic good judgment. below the hypothetical venture that God does exist, inherent in God's traits it does not require him to be a slave to the organic regulations of the universe. If there is specific Pleading occurring, this is via people who're arguing that the universe did come from not something, that for the period of a few unspecified time sooner or later in the previous the universe did not obey its own policies (or maybe the policies purely got here in later).

Answer 6

They MAY look in the windows...for their safety..if they see something...naked people they can go farther...

PS if the windshield was tinted that is a violation in NJ so that would give them cause to look closer.......If not...it would give them a "view" of what was going on in the back....

Answer 7

no not he chased the car onto private property or unless has a search warrant

Answer 8

Criminal Records Search Database : http://CriminalRecords.InfoSearchDetective.com

Answer 9

Only if he has probable cause to do so. Otherwise no.

Answer 10

No, not here in Colorado anyway..