English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

for considering homosexuality wrong? Ignorant means that I am ignoring or overlooking some fact but to my knowledge their are no facts proving homosexuality is moral. Don't get me wrong I don't think we should treat gays any differently than anyone else but if they ask me I'll let them know what I think just like when an alcoholic friend asks me if I think he is living a bad lifestyle I say yes, while still treating him respectively. Does loving the sinner mean I have to approve of his sin as well?

2007-03-25 16:01:55 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Many of you are saying, "what facts are you basing the fact that it is immoral on"
Thats my point though is that many misunderstand what ignorant means. It comes from the root word of ignore and so the burden is on you to show me something I am ignoring.

If you must know though I base my belief on the fact that God considers it to be wrong. He created sex as a gift (a great one at that) but only for those who are in a marriage because heterosexual marriage is where babies come from in case you forgot.

2007-03-25 16:18:38 · update #1

22 answers

No, the bible says that we should love the sinner, not the sin. You have no obligation to agree with anyones lifestyle, but as long as you don't treat them poorly because of it, you are not being ignorant. You are entitled to your opinion, and it sounds to me like you are not ignorant at all.

2007-03-25 16:07:22 · answer #1 · answered by Nidda 2 · 2 2

From what I've heard and seen, homosexuality is a genetic thing. What 'facts' are you using to make the judgement that its morally incorrect? As far as I'm aware, all the consequences of a homosexual lifestyle are the same as a heterosexual one so perhaps if you are judging it, you are overlooking some fact or another. Something like alcoholism has proven over time to have a negative physical impact on an individual but homosexuality has no different consequences as heterosexual activity.

2007-03-25 16:12:07 · answer #2 · answered by strpenta 7 · 2 0

Ignorant means lacking knowledge of something. Your knowledge of that something is not sufficient, not enough to convince the other party from believing that you have the knowledge about it.

Do not hesitate to accept the fact that you lack the knowledge about homosexuality condition of a certain person because you have considered it to be wrong.There is nothing wrong about homosexuality of a certain person. That is how he was created by God.When you say that it is wrong, who are you to question God for making that person to be homosexual?

So you are really ignorant about his condition. You despising him of his being homosexual person. It is of big difference to a drunken man because the drunken man was not born drunk unlike the homosexual person who was born on that way. Remember that there is big difference between despise and comments. That is your comments on the drunken person while your comments to the Homosexuality of a person is to despise him of his being born, the condition of his being born.

By loving the sinner, it means you love his person, his body but you do not like his being a sinner. You do not love his sin but you love him personally and the remedy for the solution, you must stop him from sinning to show that you love him. okay?
jtm

2007-03-25 16:31:23 · answer #3 · answered by Jesus M 7 · 0 0

What exactly did homosexuals ever do to hurt you? Can you cite any reason not based on religion or fear why homosexuality should be considered wrong? Do you know any gay people? It seems to me that current attitudes towards gays in America are a lot like pre-1950's white attitudes towards blacks (I am a straight, white person). In the past, the bible was used to justify racial prejudice just as it is now being used against gays (read the story of Ham, Noah's black son). Science has demonstrated that a significant percentage of individuals in nearly all species of higher animals engage in homosexual or bisexual conduct, and humans are no different. But if sociobiology isn't your thing, think about this- if all the evidence is wrong and there really is a god, why would he concern himself/herself/itself with such a trivial matter as gay sex, when there are galaxies to destroy and other works to be done?

2007-03-25 16:14:52 · answer #4 · answered by doubt_is_freedom 3 · 1 2

"but to my knowledge their are no facts proving homosexuality is moral".

Well, that comment doesn't strike you as ignorant? It is.
=====================
"He created sex as a gift (a great one at that) but only for those who are in a marriage because heterosexual marriage is where babies come from in case you forgot"

Er, if you're tired of being called ignorant, you might want to keep this kind of idiotic nonsense to yourself. You're digging yourself in deeper and deeper.

2007-03-25 16:08:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

The problem is that there are no facts indicating that homsexuality is NOT moral, and to be unaware of this constitutes ignorance. Moral codes derive from evolution, which applies to societies as well as to species: a society which lives by a sound moral code will survive preferably to one that does not. Since homosexuality has no effects on any part of society other than its direct practitioners, it is not a moral issue.

2007-03-25 16:08:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Moral...?

What does homosexuality have to do with morality?

This is like saying that being female is not moral. It's just a sex. Homosexuality is just a sexual orientation.

And how is homosexuality a 'sin'? Are gays HURTING you in ANY way whatsoever?

What exactly do you think they are doing WRONG? Love?

2007-03-25 16:06:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

Ironic isn't it. You know the truth, but are called ignorant by someone who truly is ignorant. (If they don't know the facts....but if they're ignoring them...I think that would be called rebellion.) Love the sinner, love the sin as well? You already know the answer to that. :)

2007-03-25 16:12:01 · answer #8 · answered by beano™ 6 · 0 2

Then stop being so ignorant.

There's no facts proving that homosexuality is IMMORAL, either.

Gays aren't asking of your approval. They're going to be gay whether your bigoted @ss "approves" it or not.

They're only asking for acceptance, and they deserve it.

2007-03-25 16:07:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

GOOD POINT--No you are not the only one. "Moral Ignorance" is the worst! And that is what any modern day Sodomites practice!

--You are right you do not have to have any liking for the filth , sin, wrong etc.-- and still have agape' principled love(in that we would not do any harm to such one) for the homosexual.

--"HATE WAS IS BAD"--INDEED is a major teaching in the Bible without the practicing of self-righteousness. NO MATTER what the morally ignorant want to say about it.

--BUT many of them want it all(the acceptance of the lifestyle and any crudeness that goes with it) and that is simply not possible for a follower of Christ.

--THE ACCOUNT of Sodom & Gomorrah is a major precident as to consider any type of immoral sex to be a perversion. Please note:

(Genesis 18:20-21) “20 Consequently Jehovah said: “The cry of complaint about Sod´om and Go·mor´rah, yes, it is loud, and their sin, yes, it is very heavy. 21 I am quite determined to go down that I may see whether they act altogether according to the outcry over it that has come to me, and, if not, I can get to know it.””

--WHAT DID GOD DETERMINE from this scenario?

(Genesis 19:12-13) “12 Then the men said to Lot: “Do you have anyone else here? Son-in-law and your sons and your daughters and all who are yours in the city, bring out of the place! 13 For we are bringing this place to ruin, because the outcry against them has grown loud before Jehovah, so that Jehovah sent us to bring the city to ruin. . .”

--NOW THIS DETERMINATION was made simply on the regular homosexual, lesbian, etc sex going on, BUT it became more REPUGNANT as they demanded the following:

(Genesis 19:4-5) “4 Before they could lie down, the men of the city, the men of Sod´om, surrounded the house, from boy to old man, all the people in one mob. 5 And they kept calling out to Lot and saying to him: “Where are the men who came in to you tonight? Bring them out to us that we may have intercourse with them.””

--SO THEN their violent lust was so aroused that they were going to GANG RAPE the 2 angels of Jehovah God.
--WHAT MORE of a judgement is needed to say the SODOMY of our modern day sodomites is indeed UNACCEPTABLE TO GOD OR CHRIST?

--CHRIST TOTALLY agreed with the Judgement of his Father Jehovah God:

(Luke 17:28-29) “28 Likewise, just as it occurred in the days of Lot: they were eating, they were drinking, they were buying, they were selling, they were planting, they were building. 29 But on the day that Lot came out of Sod´om it rained fire and sulphur from heaven and destroyed them all.”

2007-03-25 16:20:23 · answer #10 · answered by THA 5 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers