You're mixing up the sectarian aspect of the Iraq conflict with the attacks against military targets, and in both instances I would say Vietnam and the Boer War are weak comparisons.
The Iraq conflict has much in common with the Algerian Civil War. It started off with attacks against French military targets, then escalated into a full-scale civil war marked by sectarian violence. There were daily, very brutal attacks against civilians on both sides of the conflict.
There are marked similarities between the Madji Army and the Algerian fellagahs.
2007-03-25 11:43:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by lesroys 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think of you're lacking an significant element. the difficulty-loose denominator between those 2 wars is that the politicians tried to combat it --- with an identical result. as quickly as a conflict is underway, the ideal element a toddler-kisser can do is to step lower back and enable the army do their element. The politicians understand little sufficient approximately each little thing else yet look unwilling to maintain their palms off something they understand truthfully no longer something approximately. If the politicians had no longer stopped the army after the 1st Iraqui conflict, we does not have the topics we've. If the politicians had no longer demobbed the Iraqui military, growing to be a great unemployed yet armed mob, we does not have the topics we've. If the politicians had no longer tried to combat the conflict at the cheap with too few troops we does not have the topics we've. With all the political meddling occurring, it fairly is impossible to respond to your unique question concerning the known of the army or their strategies. They by no capacity have been given a huge gamble to apply them --- if that they had fought the politicians they could have been retired, so maximum of them did no longer.
2016-12-08 11:06:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by galle 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Huh??? Don't look now, but the Boers lost. Contrary to popular opinion, God really is on the side of the big battalions, and modern military history shows that counterinsurgency operations usually meet with at least some degree of success. We seem to be forcing Iraq into something like Vietnam, except that there's no equivalent to the North Vietnamese Army, but that's entirely our choice.
2007-03-25 14:18:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
the boers didn't defeat the brits, but they did win significant battles.
in fact, the boer army was well funded and supplied by germany - who armed them with the latest krupp cannons.
to my knowledge, no such thing is going on in iraq.
the support that iraq is getting is from people who give them SAM's and things like that.
no one is giving the insurrgents tanks - the modern equivalent of the cannons that the germans gave the boers...
2007-03-25 13:42:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by nostradamus02012 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Seems more like the British in Northern Ireland. These people are fighting each other over religious and ethnic differences and we are caught in the cross-fire.
2007-03-25 12:33:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Greye Wolfe 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neither acutally,. the problem there is ,. that one side ,. i forget which,. the minority ,. has had power ,. for so long,. and they realize that there about to loose it ,... and the majority has been powerless , and will gain quite a bit ,.. and so now you see fighting tit for tat amogst them ,... it's all about POWER
2007-03-25 11:30:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Hard 2
·
1⤊
0⤋