i TOTALLY agree. people say things about the Quran, for example, and make assumptions, but if you don''t understand it and haven't read what is before and after the verse, how can you say anything about it? see, i don't know anything about evolution, so i can't argue with you. besides, i'm a muslim, so why would i trash your beliefs? anyway, i'm willing to learn, but i won't change my beliefs.
2007-03-25 10:06:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by rt1290 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
I clicked on your link because I am one that is willing to be open minded and try to learn almost anything before I speak and I have had to rescind some things that I have said in the past. I will always be one that will apologize first if I think I am in the wrong or might be, but here is what I got when I clicked on your link you said that I am suppose to learn from:
sorry, page not found
at www.actionbioscience.org
The URL address you have provided is not valid. This might be because the web page address was typed incorrectly. Please check the spelling and also make sure that it does not contain any capital letters.
Listed below are suggestions to help you find the information you need:
Go to our author directory or lesson directory if you are looking for a particular author of an article or the title of a class lesson.
Go to our search engine if you would like to perform a search for key words or phrases found on our web site.
Home will take you to our site's main page.
Select from our 7 issue menus shown below:
biodiversity | environment | genomics | biotechnology | evolution | new frontiers | education
Still having trouble? Please e-mail us at info@actionbioscience.org for assistance.
2007-03-25 17:11:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Friend 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
ok ill bite
ooops, bad link, please evolve it to a better link,
while I see no reason to argue our current methods of 'dating', I still can not understand why evolutionists can not distinguish evolution-life from non-life, and evolution- the observation of the adaption of already living life forms.
These are two entirely distinctly different concepts.
I agree totally that life 'evolves' in that existing lifeforms adapt to changing environmental conditions, but these observations do not ever include a single example of a lifeform that came from nonliving material.
Can you at least see my problem? without being mean?
2007-03-25 17:04:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Tim 47 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Intuition tells people a lot of things. Rationality does not rule the world...and thankfully so.
There's a point where we begin to see the irrationality of rationality...everything becomes overly mechanical and inhuman.
...that said, rational debate is awesome...but forgiveness...although often irrational, is awesomer.
people respond better to love than to rationality pretty much all the time.
-Rob
2007-03-25 17:12:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Rob S 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I haven't said a thing! just minding me own business, reading open questions and you pop up, sounds like your having a go yourself!? I don't even know what you are on about, so i shall stay ignorant but to your question! Ha
2007-03-25 17:06:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dreamangel 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Knowledge is the enemy of religion. If you get a "blind" follower of religion to learn something like carbon dating, for example, then you will have won.
And you see, in their eyes, it's not about who's actually right or wrong. It's about who wins. That's why they have no interest in the truth. The truth is, their religion is false. And they are either willing to accept that reality, or simply pretend it doesn't exist.
2007-03-25 17:07:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Its the same everywhere.
People are afraid of what they don't know.
which is the main cause for hate, if you don't understand something you just shut it out!
People are ignorant to alot of things. Sadly its just a part of life.
2007-03-25 17:06:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by digitaldancer22 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
By the same token, I wonder why you insist upon argueing an admitted scientific unproven theory.
If you want to argue, pick a subject that you can prove
2007-03-25 17:08:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by kenny p 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
Free country men!
2007-03-25 17:05:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Lost. at. Sea. 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Then I guess I'd rather continue being "ignorant" than reading that crap
2007-03-25 17:04:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋