2007-03-25 08:08:42 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
HP. No doubt.
They're both full of nonsense. But HP is is entertaining and fun. No threats. No cultism. People don't want to run out and hate or kill people after reading it...
2007-03-25 08:11:04 · answer #1 · answered by jen1981everett 4 · 7⤊ 2⤋
There must be all children here today, because most voted for HP which I have never read, the cr@ppy disney like shows are enough.
Did you take History in High School, or are you still in the elementary grades. Is History fiction? If it is, those teachers have a lot to answer for. I guess Caesar and Tiberious, and all those characters are fiction eh, they didn't really exist and change the course of History. We are all just imagining it.
As far as HP being written better, sure, it is only fiction.
A historian records what happened, they can't help it if the events don't read like a fairy tale.
Sept. 11th will soon be part of history. Will people say in the future, that didn't really happen, they are making it up?
2007-03-25 15:32:38 · answer #2 · answered by Lukusmcain// 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
At least J K Rowling got a movie deal. Harry Potter.
2007-03-25 15:15:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Like another said, Harry Potter is better written than the NT, Paul was not a good editor for such a compilation... L Ron Hubbard could have made a better compilation than paul, and he was a crap author.
2007-03-25 15:16:27 · answer #4 · answered by XX 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Parts of the Bible, however there are good and bad bits probably due to having so many different authors. Harry Potter isn't all that well written but both are far better than the monstrosity that is the Da Vinci Code.
2007-03-25 15:12:17 · answer #5 · answered by fourmorebeers 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
HP- I can read those over and over. Isn't it amazing that single mother in Scotland wrote a better book than God? Maybe that's why I don't believe the Bible is the divine word.
2007-03-25 15:15:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
The Bible. Harry Potter is awful and at times ridiculous. The Bible doesn't have any obnoxious boy wizards, and it's got some pretty kickass battles, really weird sexual moments, and an epic scope that puts pretty much every fantasy novel to shame.
2007-03-25 15:13:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Harry Potter is better written then the NT, no doubt
less authors to confuse the storyline
2007-03-25 15:12:03 · answer #8 · answered by Rhymes with Camera 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Harry Potter. It has fewer contradictions than the bible.
2007-03-25 15:11:36 · answer #9 · answered by gruz 4 · 7⤊ 2⤋
Neither! I like Stephen King's books better. I just finished Pet Sematary and I'm scared of my cat now.
2007-03-25 15:16:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Harry Potter.. it has a good story line
2007-03-25 15:11:10 · answer #11 · answered by Screamin' Banshee 6 · 8⤊ 1⤋