Which story do you find ridicoulous? That the entire univers was created by a supernatural being to nuture life, or two small microscopic adams qoincidently colliding to create almost all of life and space itself?
2007-03-25 07:01:06 · 24 answers · asked by hah k 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I love the misspellings. Did you do that to make people who believe in God look stupid, or can you just not spell? I would guess the second one.
2007-03-25 07:05:20 · answer #1 · answered by Deus Luminarium 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well.... first... its "atoms" and its "coincidentally".
And that is NOT how science explains that the universe was made. You'd know that if you understood the science.
You are one of those people that obviously needs to go back to school. Please study, biology, physics, chemistry, geology, and archaeology. You might like to throw in a little astrophysics, and genetics just to round it all out.
You'll come back with a much greater understanding of science than you ever knew was possible.
And, btw, reading a single biology textbook is not enough. You need to actually study all of those because they're all related and, together, will explain what you should already know.
2007-03-25 14:10:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
What about 'two small microscopic eves'? Didn't they 'qoincidently collid'? Or don't they exist?
(If you get the language, the spelling and the facts down, the first is far, far less likely - there is *no* supernatural.)
2007-03-25 14:06:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
So where did those two microscopic atoms come from in the first place? There has to be a starting point for anything that exists that is tangible that was created in the first place. So, it stands to reason that God would be the Creator, and that He created those two small atoms...
2007-03-25 14:05:34 · answer #4 · answered by galfromcal 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Since I am on this earth because of a crazy coincidence of just the right sperm out of millions happened to reach my mother's egg... I like the coinsidence of atoms theory best. I have experienced coincidence - but I have never experienced supernatural beings (to my knowledge)
2007-03-25 14:23:27 · answer #5 · answered by magicpixie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The supernatural being as there is no proof of one. At least with atoms you can see them though an electron microscope.
2007-03-25 14:04:47 · answer #6 · answered by genaddt 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
God did not create the heavens and the earth to nurture life but to glorify himself. That's your first mistake.
Secondly, adams infers a homosexual union.
2007-03-25 14:06:03 · answer #7 · answered by Bimpster 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The idea of simple particles existing uncaused is much easier to believe than that of a super-intelligent entity capable of designing and creating entire universes existing uncaused.
2007-03-25 14:05:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It does not matter what is more ridiculous to the very limited human brain/mind it is whats true that matters. Quantum theory goes beyond being ridiculous, happens to be true though.
2007-03-25 14:04:58 · answer #9 · answered by fourmorebeers 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It's not a matter of ridiculous. Somehow, everything got here, so we know that something did have to happen. I do think it's silly to attribute this to a mythological being.
2007-03-25 14:05:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋