i see sum dumb question like "yahoo's pro illegal!!!" every time i go in this section. why do a lot of anti illegals think that since their answer or question gets removed, yahoo has to be against them? is that how ur brain works? do u think the whole world hates u? or do u think that maybe its the other users that report u??? i dont think the workers at yahoo give a **** if ur anti illegal.
2007-03-25 01:47:08 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
Well my stand on the issue is well know but I don't feel that Yahoo is one way or another. Its like saying my television is biased because some pro illegals appear on it. I have seen insults and race related questions and answers from both sides get deleted. I have seem good intelligent posts from both sides get removed. Its simply a matter of who takes offence to your post and if they do ,you get reported. Yahoo doesn't read each violation that gets reported.They simply send it out .Answers like the first one ,you received can be construed as being insulting to anyone on the anti side. It doesn't bother me at all,but some one may find it insulting . Also some people may not like you simply because you don't agree with them,so they report your posts.
Do you see my point ?
2007-03-25 02:19:25 · answer #1 · answered by Yakuza 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I am pro legal immigration. I don't see illegals as an immigrant - just law breakers within the United States that should receive the penalty of their crimes.
As to the thought that Yahoo is 'pro' or 'anti' anything - I think is foolish. If there was just one person making all the choices of what stays - what is deleted - then there might be something to that. But such is not the case.
What bothers me most is the 'questions' that are nothing more than slams against other users of the system - and they stay there even tho they have nothing to do with the topic of the area. Sifting thru them is a pain - along with a waste of time. Those that have done this, I have seen from both sides of the issue and is not limited to one group alone.
Since immigration and the problems of illegals within this country looks like it is going to be a very hot topic in the coming election - those that waste time picking out their perception of faults within another vs. looking at the issues is actually sad.
2007-03-25 02:48:30 · answer #2 · answered by Toe the line 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yahoo is most certainly pro-illegal!
I say this because I have been on an illegal immigration crusade, trying to find any information that I can about illegal immigration so that when I speak on the issue, I can know what I'm talking about. When I began trying to find information a year or so back, I always started with yahoo. I would type in illegal immigration in the search and hundreds and hundreds of articles would come up. I would then go to the special section of yahoo which specifically had articles, editorials, and pics geared towards illegal immigration, both negative and positive.
Today, try to search for information about illegal immigration by doing the same as I did (typing illegal immigration news in the search) and all that will come up are articles and opinion pieces that are pro-illegal immigration; articles asking for sympathy, compassion, forgiveness, and understanding for illegals; all the while condemning anyone against illegal immigration as inhumane, racists, xenophobes, and anything else pro-illegals would say (because they do not have a legitimate argument) to gain sympathy for their illegal family members, buddies, gardeners, nannies, and cooks.
Meanwhile, on Google (which I never used until after I noticed what yahoo was doing) there are thousands of articles that deal with illegal immigration, looking at both sides (pro and against).
If anyone doesn’t believe me try!
2007-03-25 06:32:43 · answer #3 · answered by Terry H 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Immigration is and always will be allowed but legally.My parents and Grand parents came here legally as with our entire country.Doing it legally is fine but to walk or swim across a border to have a baby and gain citizenship is just wrong.If someone breaks into your house should he be allowed to stay or be removed.
2007-03-25 06:47:22 · answer #4 · answered by redwingnut16 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
For me, professional-life does propose anti-abortion, besides the fact that it additionally ability anti-embryonic stem cellular "remedies", anti-euthanasia, and anti-dying penalty. It additionally ability helping pregnant women with in spite of they % (emotional, social, economic academic), instructing anybody with regard to the regularly occurring jobs that flow alongside with their relationships, and assisting teenagers, extremely females, with self shielding behaviours and self belief. It ability lobbying for ethically impartial stem cellular analyze, inclusive of grownup stem cellular and umbilical twine blood analyze and remedies, and extra centers for women to have the flexibility to donate their umbilical twine blood for those applications. (there is in basic terms one place in my entire state you're able to do this, and then in basic terms interior of specific hours on weekdays.) It ability merchandising ideal pallative care, psychiatric centers, extra value-effective and extra ideal assistive technologies for independant residing and in spite of else can help strengthen the extensive-unfold of life for those in %. It ability advocating for the top of the dying penalty and torture, even in situations the place the regularly occurring public opinion is against the belief. So renaming the prolife circulation to anti abortion isn't on for me, yet in line with possibility those individuals who're extremely professional-life might desire to signify people who're "single concern" professional-lifers get themselves their very own little foyer group and enable us to concentration on the huge photograph.
2016-10-20 10:05:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's the siege mentality of small minds. They think the US is being invaded, and it's all the fault of the invaders. Seeing such a small part of the picture makes them paranoid as well as mean.
2007-03-25 01:58:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 6⤋