English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

Read Romans chapter 1. It refers to women being given up for lust for one another. It's not a positive reference, I can tell you that.

Here's a lemon cookie and some milk. Enjoy!

2007-03-17 21:33:33 · answer #1 · answered by Last Ent Wife (RCIA) 7 · 1 1

Again, Romans 1 refers to lesbians.

Look, I know it's popular to say, "The Bible is against . . ." but its probably going to miss the point everytime.

The Bible focuses on the Law in many places. But the Law was put there so that we can understand that we are sinners, not so much that we can identify each and every sin, but that we have the nature of sin in us.

Some people need all those little sins on a list inorder to understand this. I might have too when I was a new Christian. But it's not so much about those things, the focus is supposed to be on Jesus who delievers us from the penalty of those sins and strips away that sin nature when we are resurrected.

So all those things about this sin and that sin is really just a waste of time.

2007-03-17 21:32:08 · answer #2 · answered by Christian Sinner 7 · 2 0

i'm Christian and function gay acquaintances and no, they do no longer computer virus me in any respect... yet i'm fully disgusted at Political tries to intentionally subvert the sacred union of marriage with the help of redefining it as something different than a lifetime union between a guy and a woman. Ignoring all organic and organic info, all info for sure shown in the organic international and turning classic kinfolk values the different way up and making a mockery of the two criminal and civil regulation. additionally, FYI, those comparable gay acquaintances can no longer comprehend why the Gvmt felt the might desire to try this, on the grounds that that they had each and every of the legal protections they might ask for in elementary terms the Civil Partnership legislations...

2016-10-18 23:41:58 · answer #3 · answered by console 4 · 0 0

yes, of course. however, most of society is blind to the full dimension of sodomy. Most picture it as anal sex and that is it. Sodomy is both oral and anal sex which again goes against the course of nature.
That is why it says man that are without "natural affections". Excuse my candor but the penis was made to be received by the vagina "only"! The natural laws of nature cannot be emphasized enough in the midst of so much perversion in our days.

2007-03-17 21:39:46 · answer #4 · answered by God help us 6 · 1 1

Since the bible is against homosexuality, it is already implied lesbianism as well.

2007-03-17 21:29:05 · answer #5 · answered by Konjo Nashi Pirate™ 5 · 3 1

Modern concepts of sodomy suggest anal sex but Biblical concepts suggest anything other than that which involves vaginas and penises and nothing else.

2007-03-17 21:33:42 · answer #6 · answered by ophelliaz 4 · 0 1

The bible may be against it, but Jimmy Swaggart thinks it's hot.

2007-03-17 21:57:48 · answer #7 · answered by link955 7 · 1 1

Romans 1:24-27
read that it says it all
i just looked it up.

2007-03-17 21:39:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Sodomy includes homosexuality and homosexuality includes "lesbianism" (if you want to put it that way)

2007-03-17 21:28:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Lesbianism is homosexuality. And that is forbidden by God.

2007-03-17 21:28:45 · answer #10 · answered by C J 6 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers