ISAM. 15:23 For rebellion [is as] the sin of witchcraft, and
stubbornness [is as] iniquity and idolatry. Because thou hast
rejected the word of the LORD, he hath also rejected thee from
[being] king.
All the rationalizations, mistranslations, and implications, transfrence to Satan minions or Demon possessions that are only in Christians daydreams and their Shouters mouths, come down to "rebellion [is as] the sin of witchcraft." and "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live." Christians cannot abide with any who hold other belief, they do everything they can to denigrate or absorb them and if it doesn't work, destroy or in some circumstances Murder them in the Christian God's name.
Those that have died for Christian's sins and such words as above are Black, of the Crafts, Homosexuals and priests of other religions. This is history and the present.
2007-03-17
20:44:00
·
10 answers
·
asked by
Terry
7
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
For those that are confused by ISAM that is First of Samuel and I used the KJV 1611.
2007-03-17
21:31:46 ·
update #1
None have refuted that Christians murdered people as witches using the simple fact the people would not become Christians, by calling such people witches using ISAM.
I'm sorry that "Do you believe you can refute them?" is above your education level. Ask your Shouter to explain the words.
2007-03-17
21:35:47 ·
update #2
Well, for every person who died for "thou shalt not suffer a witch to live", ten thousand or more have died for "from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs". Is that significant?
2007-03-17 20:57:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by mjb63114 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'm sorry which you have been stated for violating the TOS in this way. It would not look undemanding, because of the fact the know-how scoffer is with the help of no skill offensive to me. call me a scoffer all you desire, this is what i'm. As for a notice that should not be got here upon offensive with the help of absolutely everyone, i desire to recommend 'atheist', as long as you spell it properly. We atheists are in many circumstances very choosy approximately spelling.
2016-10-18 23:40:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by console 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't see how this quote from I Samuel gives anyone the right to murder. In fact it is about King Saul not doing what God told him to do so Samuel is telling him that he isn't going to be king much longer.
If God told Saul to destroy some tribe or city it was usually because they were doing something so evil that God wouldn't tolerate it anymore.
2007-03-17 21:29:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ellen J 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Wow, you must have spent hours searching for this stuff.
If you are looking for something to use to bash Christianity, try the gospels -- there are four of them. You're sure to find something. I have no idea what "Isam" is but it's not in my bible.
2007-03-17 20:58:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Freedom 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Which book of the bible is this in? ISAM? I know no ISAM? If you mean isiah welol that was in the old testament before Jesus came along and forgave all sins
2007-03-17 20:55:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
So, in other words, if all the Christians got obsorbed then the world would be at peace. Interesting. So, hypothetically, when there are no Christians but there is still war and murder who will you blame then?
2007-03-17 20:55:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by hisgloryisgreat 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
First off, killing and murder are two separate things...get it?? God sets what is and what is not sin. Get it? Sin can only occur Against God. Explain P3 please.
Erin Go Bragh, still.
2007-03-17 20:57:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
You give no facts with your claims, and show your hatred, bigotry, and intolerance very clearly here.
You assume that you know what other people believe, and how they interpret things....yet there are dozens of different Christian faiths who interpret scripture differently.
The only thing that is obvious from your statements is that you are extremely intolerant towards the beliefs of others, and therefore extremely bigoted.
2007-03-17 20:53:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Bryan _ 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
flowery languistics have indeed dazzled, in plainer tongue speaketh thy inquiry, if thou wouldst, that we may know the specific nature of thy query
2007-03-17 20:50:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
whats your point?
2007-03-17 20:51:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋