2007-03-17 11:43:00 · 7 answers · asked by Judas. S. Burroughs. 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Don't forget the "Stork Theory" instead of sex education. We want to stay consistent.
2007-03-17 11:46:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you really think about it, nobody looks that intelligent when they trip and fall. Therefore, I propose a theory of "Stupid Falling" that should also be taught in schools alongside Intelligent Falling and Gravity.
2007-03-17 11:47:52 · answer #2 · answered by Lunarsight 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Haha. Why certain, for sure. I advise, if smart layout is taught in biology courses alongside with the perception of Evolution, it really is no longer straightforward to omit the smart Falling concept from physics instructions. :]
2016-11-26 19:26:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Look, we all know that gravity is just a lie invented by the insane Isaac Newton. It is not true, and should not be taught at all. Even Neuton admitted that he did not believe in it!
2007-03-17 11:49:21 · answer #4 · answered by U-98 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes. It's important that we give our students the opportunity to learn ALL sides of the issue, so that they can make an informed decision.
:-P
2007-03-17 11:46:26 · answer #5 · answered by . 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, assuming of course that we can keep them in school that long!
2007-03-17 11:52:34 · answer #6 · answered by Helzabet 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
How long did it take you to think this one up? I love it.
2007-03-17 11:48:18 · answer #7 · answered by bugs280 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋