Logics cant prove Love, they cant prove Quantum physics.
Aren't logics as personal as emotions?
What is beyond logics and emotions?
2007-03-17 08:15:04 · 16 answers · asked by ۞Aum۞ 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
misers click on thumbs up if you like it
2007-03-17 08:18:57 · update #1
I know what i am talking.. you are talking too logically (read personally)
2007-03-17 08:20:29 · update #2
The truth is beyond logic and emotion. I agree that logic is limited. The result is defined by the starting point.
2007-03-18 00:35:50 · answer #1 · answered by katinka hesselink 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You cannot prove everything by logic.
Logic is fine to certain extent and helps in growth, beyond which if one continues one slips and falls and cannot proceed any further. Logic will block us from enjoying the absolute truth.
After a level of logic, reasoning and questioning, faith and belief should take over. Just accept. This will give us humility. With humility one can slip into and enjoy the absolute nature.
It is the combination of logic and humility we can enjoy any thing and everything.
Combination of logic and humility can help us transcend time, space situation.
2007-03-17 18:01:15 · answer #2 · answered by Prabhakar A 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Logic can prove quantum mechanics, actually, which is why it is accepted as a branch of physics. As an objectivist, I believe that logic has an objective reality that is not personal, but universal. A is A.
2007-03-17 08:19:42 · answer #3 · answered by mjb63114 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
logics?
Love is a human emotion.
Quantum Physics have a logic to them, we just dont understand it yet.
Emotions are human
2007-03-17 08:16:57 · answer #4 · answered by funaholic 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Spiritual logic, emotions and beliefs are not lame
while material logic, emotions and beliefs are lame.
2007-03-17 20:34:44 · answer #5 · answered by Gaura 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Eric Hoffer, a philosopher from the 50s said, "The Greeks invented logic but were not fooled by it. "
~ Eric Putkonen
2007-03-17 08:29:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Blind faith is greater risky. in certainty 'lame logics' additionally are an occasion of blind faith. the guy blinded is in his very own faith. He tries to disprove besides the fact that his faith (or his good judgment) won't settle for. advice: genuine faith lies in following the course shown with the help of your God. a real believer might admire the different persons theory in his God, because of the fact to him this is in elementary terms a distinctive call of the comparable entity.
2016-10-18 22:38:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, because "logics" are logical. They can prove things that aren't abstract.
2007-03-17 08:17:31 · answer #8 · answered by The Wired 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Bleeding
2007-03-17 08:19:10 · answer #9 · answered by Clouds 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Intelligence.
2007-03-17 08:17:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋