Since Rights Groups have accused Yahoo of helping China trace Shi Tao's e-mail exchanges with a New York Web site, and Tao was jailed for 10 years, do you think Yahoo is justified in cooperating with China's censors? And do you think Yahoo is justified in allowing everyone on Yahoo Answers to censor everyone else's statements by merely objecting? In both cases, Yahoo is not the censor, but merely allows others to do the censoring, and a great deal of the censoring on Yahoo Answers is not because the guidelines are crossed, but because someone objects to an opinion being expressed that is contrary to their own opinion. The source of the China Incident is The Epoch Times, January 25 - 31, although I am really more concerned with the censoring that takes place here on Yahoo answers and is frequently totally unjustified. What do you think?
2007-03-17 03:53:14 · 2 answers · asked by Davie 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I think the reason that you have not recieved any answers is that your question is too deep and complex and most have not thought about it
2007-03-18 15:46:24 · answer #1 · answered by free2bme55 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree. A person can't really say what they want here, so it just becomes a silly game. I'm sure Bush's homeland security is recording everything to be held against you someday..
2007-03-17 05:36:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋