I have been studying the ideas and information given on the sites found under the headings " Deconstructing the myth of aids " . My whole conception, understanding and beliefs have been thrown into question. Be warned if you are going to watch the footage, some of the recordings last up to 2hrs, but in my opinion needs to be watched in order to see the full picture. If you take time to check the sites out could you please get back in touch with a reply as to your opinion. Thank you
2007-03-14
17:08:17
·
13 answers
·
asked by
jennybuttins
3
in
Health
➔ Diseases & Conditions
➔ STDs
The link given by the poster below is not one of the links i am suggesting. Regarding the poster below stateing that i am not the brightest of people, this is true, but i am intelligent enough to accept alternative ideas and come to my own conclusions. I am also smart enough not to be brain washed by governments and people in high standing positions. Unfortunately we live in a world controlled by greed and self gratification and the fact that it can be put before human life en mass, does not shock or surprise me. I choose not to stick my head in the sand and accept what someone is telling me or what the majority think to be true.
2007-03-14
17:29:10 ·
update #1
I would appreciate if readers of the post could have a look at some of the sites i suggest . What i am looking for is an opinion on the information given there. Although i stated in my original post that some of the footage in the links lasts for almost 2 hrs ( and may discourage viewing ), there are others maybe lasting only 15-30mins
2007-03-14
19:15:32 ·
update #2
I don't know why people find it so hard to believe, that this could be true. I looked at the site and it makes sense. People are so blinkered and closed minded. It would be too horrific to deal with, if it were the truth. It would be even more horrific, to find out that it was, and just have accepted the lie without question. Would be interesting to know how many of the people who answered, took the time to look at the site, and watch it through to the end. I notice only one or two mention having looked. People will believe what they have been allowed to hear. Then as a previous poster mentioned there's the religious nuts, who like nothing better than to see people who disagree with their belief in some god, be struck down with plague and pestilence and sent to hell in damnation. It is the scientist who discovered the HIV virus himself, and other world renowned scientists, that are speaking up against the idea of it being responsible for aids. Even if people don't agree with it , their opinion doesn't count for much if they have not gathered information, and are just going along with what they have been made to believe is the truth.
2007-03-15 03:13:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by closedmindssuck 1
·
4⤊
2⤋
Western Wyoming is rather appealing. Jackson hollow, Teton nationwide Park..etc. once you leave the Rocky Mountains and head into the plains it gets aesthetically unsightly. i recognize somebody from Wyoming I even have been to Wyoming many circumstances Wyoming has numerous oil as evidenced by way of each and all the drilling going on there The state has a small inhabitants for its length. yet I have no undertaking with it. Hell i could desire to purchase kegs of beer there and purchase all childrens of unlawful fireworks so i'm no longer able to be all mattress, eh?
2016-10-02 03:48:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
WOW ! That's a bit of an eye opener. It gives you another perspective on things, which i personally will take on board. I don't have enough information yet to form a positive opinion, although what i did hear makes perfect sense to me. I have to agree the bible bashers love the thought of aids ( having sex outside marriage or with a stranger can kill you, homosexuality kills etc etc ). I think you might just get some arguments that aids does indeed exist from them, as like their belief in god, it won't be questioned because they want to believe it's true,and it fits in with their narrow view of life, without acknowledging the facts for and against. I find your links fascinating, and will pass them on in an attempt to find out other peoples views on the subject.
2007-03-14 19:35:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
There is no test for HIV, the test used counts your white blood cells, which indicates there may be a virus present.The amount of white cells in your blood at any given moment fluctuates, it could possibly be due to a simple virus or your feeling run down and your imune system is weak at that time ( so your white cells are off somewhere else in the body fighting infection and are not gathered in the blood ). If the count falls to 200 or less per volume of blood you test +, in some other countries their policy dictates a higher count, so you could be tested here and be + and tested in Canada and be - . HIV virus it's self has never been isolated, as it is so difficult to find in the body and remove ( it is not found in the blood ) and there have been no papers written showing a proven link to Aids, since the condition was first brought to light in the early 80s. The HIV virus has been around since time began without causing the symptoms of AIDS. No HIV virus has ever been found in sperm, blood, sweat, saliva, urine or any other bodily fluids. There are people who have been tested as HIV positive who have never gone on to develop AIDS. There are people who have been tested negative who show symptoms of the disease.There are people who have had false + results, meaning their count was low, so were told they had HIV, but after further testing had a - result because their count was up. If someone is suffering from cancer and is tested as HIV+ then it is termed as Aids. Someone who tests HIV- merely has cancer. Someone with Diarrhoea who is + is said to be displaying the symptoms of Aids someone who is - merely has Diarrhoea. Someone who is showing signs of Dementia who tests + is labeled as having Aids Dementia, someone - merely has Dementia. The drugs used in the fight against Aids actually have side effects that could be seen as the symptoms of Aids. AZT was found after testing on animals to be too toxic for human use, and was banned, until it was brought forward and used on humans for the first time, when Aids hit the spotlight, and there was an outcry to find a cure. The job of these drugs is to kill off cells, unfortunately they do not distinguish between healthy / sick cells and break down the immune system, leaving people open to all the illnesses and diseases associated with Aids, and usage will eventually lead to death. I find it strange that all the diseases that kill an Aids sufferer have also been around for such along time and suddenly millions of people are dying from them. I am open to debate. I am also a nurse, and have been for almost 28yrs but don't believe " just because someone says so", until i am armed with information and can reach my own conclusion.
2007-03-14 22:52:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by angelinturmoil 2
·
6⤊
2⤋
It really kills me that people up to now would rather deny the obvious than face the facts. I have been in the healthcare industry for a couple of years now and i have witnessed first hand the effects of AIDS in communities and families. Even in my own family.
When will people ever open their eyes to the truth? Why do we decide to deny the obvious? Do we tell ourselves these things so that we can sleep well at night? Do we tell ourselves that if we keep on saying it does not exist one day we are gonna wake up and it would all have been a dream?
Yesterday, one of the Ministers in South Africa who has been on the helm of denying that AIDS exists was admitted in a hospital with Pneumococcal Pnuemonia and accepted the fact that she has been wrong and is recieving treatment as of now. But even with that revelation, a lot of people still insist it does not exist.
Duesberg dared people that he was gonna infect himself with the virus to prove that it does not exist. I wonder why he never went through with it if he believed that he would not get infected.
How can we aafter all that we have seen still say that we dont believe?
I implore all of you to polease dont ignore this as other people want you to do.
Please before you make your decisions please first go to the countries ravaged by this deadly disease and see by yourselves first hand.
http://www.nytimes.com/top/news/health/diseaseconditionsandhealthtopics/aids/index.html and click on the video links.
http://nytimes.com/packages/html/international/20060305_LESOTHO_FEATURE/blocker.html
2007-03-15 09:25:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by emanzit 3
·
4⤊
3⤋
It is odd that you should consider such a strange point of view. I have been in medicine since before HIV/Aids emerged. I have watched the understanding of this terrible scourge gradually evolve, and the information that we now accept about its pathophysiology come together like pieces of some terrible jigsaw. I have seen patients in all stages of the disease. It is difficult to imagine how some one could be so detached from reality that they do not accept this mass of evidence.
2007-03-14 22:15:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dr Frank 7
·
3⤊
5⤋
check out CDC.gov and you will see some info that shows you HIV is really related to AIDS. It's easy to watch blog videos or internet videos from people all over the place.
2007-03-15 04:20:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by nicoleblingy2003 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
Well, as a nurse I think I'll say that it does very much so exist. Having looked after people suffering with the disease I think they would be pretty insulted that there is such suggestion.
2007-03-14 21:41:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by FiB 2
·
4⤊
5⤋
Yes it does very much exist lot of people around the world have it
2007-03-14 17:15:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
5⤋
Jeez, where have you been for, say, the past 30-35 years. Nobody, absolutely nobody, has yet died from aids. AIDS weakens your system so that you die from diseases that healthy people shake off every day.
2007-03-14 17:13:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
10⤋