Does charles darwin's theory 100% explains the miraculous creations of mother nature?

Question

You can fool your brain but you can't fool your heart.

Answer 1

Ever since Charles Darwin invented the theory of evolution people have been trying to figure it out. Surely his notion that some reasoning, called "natural selection" was/is the basis of all things. Of course, Natural Selection is voodoo science at best. If, in fact, a natural selection was taking place and that means that the fittest survive and improve in all ways, then why would a common ancestor branch out into all the primates that we have today?

Surely, after all this time that "so-called" evolution has been taking place only one species of primate would have emerged as the fittest and best adapted. That creature would be much more apelike, that is, with all the abilities that apes have and man lacks. The theory of evolution discounts this by stating mankind developed brain power instead which is just not reasonable. And, then, of course you have the "discoveries" every now and then they claim to be the absolute proof, which, do not prove anything.

Most people who believe in evolution do not listen when these "discoveries" are made. What the actual discoverer says. "This suggests." or, "we can conclude from this." or "This maybe." But also discount the fact that many or even most of the scientist's that are working on this theory, already believe in it, so are looking for something to prove it. To me it is like wanting to take a survey, but expecting a certain result.
So anything that remotely comes close to that result is stated as being proof. And then the question of where did it start? Spontaneous life is a mathimatical improbablity with odds of it happening of about 100 billion to one.

So the miraculous creations probably are just that, miraculous creations.

Answer 2

Your question is slightly at a loss for words. A theory is a proof. Darwin's theory describes the fact of evolution. Darwin made numerous significant factors. they're: a million. Imperfect duplicate skill offspring are such as, yet rather diverse from their mothers and dads. 2. no longer each newborn survives to adulthood and not all adults have offspring. 3. by the years inhabitants replace to the element that it is outstanding from the 'originator' inhabitants. None of those are doubted by skill of technological awareness. of direction, Darwin did no longer be attentive to truly some issues, including genetics. His theory has been changed because of the fact the unique, whether it is dazzling how plenty Darwin have been given authentic.

Answer 3

The heart is just a pump. What you really mean is the emotions. and they can be easily fooled. After all for centuries before Christianity, many other religions had other explanations of creation. The believers would be now saying "Oh my, you Christians are so easily fooled, how could one person make all this. It's got to be the committee of gods with Ra (Zeus, Jupiter) at the head."

And ... yes it lays down the structure on which evolutionary explanation has been build. Indeed the explanation makes nature and all that it is even more wonderful. How far we have evolved to be the animal that we are. Yet when we look at the higher order primates we can see instantly recognise our roots. To not do so is to deny who we are.

Answer 4

If you were to check it out, you would find that Charles Darwin plagerized his book from his grandfather. You would find that later in life Charles denounced evolution, claiming it was the rantings of a young man who was on fire for what he believed. Finally, Charles graduated from a Seminary, and was not a scientist. When his book came out, it was the mid 1800's, and it justified slavery. Just a few facts to help you.

Answer 5

No and it never set out to, nor has it been held up to - like Om said, it was the first of a lot of steps. Strangely enough, those of scientific mind don't claim any one book has all the answers.

And I'll have you know my heart is way dumber and more gullible than my head - draw from that what you will, I can take it!

Answer 6

I read his entire book "The Origin of Species" and I don't think so. It provides pretty good evidence that species have adapted to their and environment, changed, and formed more diverse groups, but I can't remember the book saying anything about religion at all. It's just the way some people decided to interpret it. Mostly it talked about finches and other animals on the Galapagos Islands and discussed why he thought there were different types of birds, turtles and so on.

Answer 7

Darwin's theory is the scientific explanation for the beginning of the human race but there are still a number of unanswered questions surrounding the subject.
it comes down to what you believe. Science can't explain everything as belief in God or a higher entity can't explain everything.

Answer 8

The Genes
Everything that transpires within the body is controlled by the three billion base pairs that make up the 100,000 genes that form the 23 paired chromosomes within the nucleus of nearly every cell. The amount of information stored within a single nucleus is equal to a library of 1000 encyclopedias, each with 1000 pages. Multiply that by the 35 billion cells in a brain, not to mention the ten or more trillion cells in a single body, and the amount of information moving about the body in each second becomes astronomical. Yet if one could put all of the DNA coordinating the growth, development, and functioning of every human on Earth into a single pile, it would weigh barely 50 grams. How could a particle smaller than dust have enough knowledge to, as it were, multiply into a trillion-room skyscraper—and also know the color, shape, and size of every room, every worker who would ever be employed in it, and every speck of furniture, wiring, and plumbing? (This speck might even know the past, the present, and the future.)

Did these all-knowing genes come about through a series of accidents? If so, that would mean that an average of two bases were added to our chromosomes per year throughout the presumed three billion years of life. They were also placed in the right order at the right time on the correct chromosomes, and were fully capable of coordinating with the other genes. For example, the genes that control human eye color and shape must either reside close by each other or have a way of communicating. The gene specifying the texture of a person’s hair would not function well if it were placed with the genes for the ear or for bladder function. A major challenge to evolution has been whether repeated mutations could truly have created changes in the correct order.

Interactivity
Every aspect of human physiology has multiple facets, steps, purposes, managers, feedback loops, and anticipated outcomes. The idea that ten or more trillion cells can even coordinate with each other is mind-boggling. How can the sight of a tennis ball’s shape, size, color, and speed be sent to dozens of spots in the brain at the same time, be recombined into a functional image, and then result in an action—all in less than a second? The fact that a mother and her baby simultaneously know when it’s time to be delivered, and the baby knows when to take its first breath, seems like a miracle. A breath taken too early would result in drowning or suffocation; one too late would cause permanent brain damage. The process that causes a baby to suckle and a mother’s breasts to start releasing milk simultaneously cannot have come about with a few random changes. And why is it that lactation is a natural contraceptive? To lessen sibling competition for mother’s milk? Why does a nursing baby lack teeth the first seven to nine months? To lessen breast injuries? The chances of multiple, purposeful, interacting mutations happening to two individuals and then being passed down the generations is beyond calculation. If one were to try to argue to the contrary, one would need to find examples of newborns that progressed through tiny, incremental steps: from those that didn’t breast-feed, to species that partially breast-feed, to present-day mammals.

No such data exists.

How does the liver know to grow in synchrony with the other organs? Why do all lungs always look like lungs? How do the calves and thighs know to grow at the same rate as the knees and toes? Leonardo da Vinci’s famous Vitruvian Man demonstrates this symmetry. With outstretched arms and legs, this man’s fingers and toes touch the circumference of a circle, and his navel lies exactly in the center. If his extremities remain perpendicular, their further points touch all sides of a square.

The body automatically maintains its design integrity. There are no fossils found with lopsided extremities. Somehow the top half coordinates with the bottom half, the left side with the right side, the front with the back. Just the complexity of managing simultaneous, coordinated growth alone is overwhelming. Can it possibly be coincidence?

Look at how we transfer sugar, minerals, proteins, fats, carbohydrates, and vitamins from our dinner plates to our mouths, down to the gastrointestinal tract, through the walls of the small bowel, into the bloodstream, through the liver, and ultimately to every cell in the body. Millions of macroscopic and microscopic processes are utilized. How does the body even know which sugar (and there are many types) to absorb, or which protein (and there are hundreds) goes where, when, and in what quantity? How does it know which substances are safe to absorb, and which should be ignored, quickly eliminated, or destroyed? How does the small bowel know how to cooperate with the 500 different kinds of bacteria that live in it? These are incredibly complex functions that work together—and only together—to maintain the health of an individual.

How does the body know when there’s too much or too little sugar in the bloodstream and whether more or less insulin should be secreted? How does it mobilize the sugar stored in the liver and change it into energy,using as many as 1000 mitochondria per cell? Questions such as these are endless, yet they address important bodily functions that were unknown at Darwin’s time. Evolution says we easily changed from prehistoric fish digesting algae to primates whosavor meat. But not only do humans have many more and different digestive processes than our presumed forebears, but experts overlook the relatively sudden appearance of a tongue and a full set of teeth— with a total lack of precedents. There are few, if any, examples of mouths with partial tongues, a single, odd tooth, or both.

Answer 9

It doesn't work that way. Darwin proposed Evolution, but it took a few decades before it was universally accepted in the scientific community. Since then, it's evolved into the modern theory (i.e. model to explain observations) it is today.

There are certainly "things left to explain", i.e. holes, and nature holds lots of wonders we have yet to understand. What would be dramatic would be any contradictions. But any and all contradictions proposed so far have turned out to be false. Evolution stands.

Answer 10

i dont think so, it does explain part of the process,, what occurs sometimes and often, especially in the animanl world, meaning animals other then human
i have no conflict between evolution and creation,,,,,,, evolution , to me, explains some of what happened to some of the creations
we do evolve, as humans,,,,,,, alot of it isnt due to darwins theory,,, but to our own human inventions,,,,, medicine,, better nutrition etc
that is why slowly over the years we have gotten taller,,,,,