English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-09 21:14:23 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

There are many questions, some questions aren't "aware" of themselves as questions, there is an answer. The question is the built in fail safe. Are the answers that were once questions "allowed" to question the questions? Would this be OK? I turn around and punt again.

2007-03-11 09:38:37 · update #1

9 answers

questions answer questions! :-)
The next level as our other cosmic friend has highlighted. Consider a spiral each question opposite an answer opposite a question spiralling into the centre and out into the infinite. At the centre where the answer meats the question that is where the point of creation occurs and we find you....

what do you think?

2007-03-10 20:01:00 · answer #1 · answered by James 5 · 3 0

In the Religion and Spirituality section? Yes, the vast majority of the time it is OK, and necessary.

The basis for most of the questions, here, is utterly spurious.

2007-03-10 06:51:56 · answer #2 · answered by Frog Five 5 · 1 0

Freedom of speech

2007-03-13 12:13:01 · answer #3 · answered by Ollie 7 · 1 0

All is OK, questions arise from the egoic mind. The true self has no questions, only truth, where there is nothing to question.

2007-03-13 10:54:53 · answer #4 · answered by cosmicaware1 2 · 2 0

Is it OK to leave no stone unturned?

2007-03-11 11:24:44 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 2 0

yes of course it is. it's called freedom of speech!!

2007-03-10 06:34:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

i have people answer my q with why are you asking.but they dont need to answer!

2007-03-10 13:31:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

yes why not

2007-03-10 09:36:48 · answer #8 · answered by ringo711 6 · 1 0

absolutely! we must challenge what is not understood or die perpetually!

2007-03-11 05:32:15 · answer #9 · answered by ONEMIND 2 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers