English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

on insurance as i think it is his fault for driving without due care

2007-03-09 20:32:26 · 16 answers · asked by PETER Y 1 in Cars & Transportation Insurance & Registration

16 answers

I believe if you were reversing then it would be your fault. If you were reversing back to square off then you should of anticipated someone not waiting to see if you were finished.
The other driver is likely to say that you reversed into him and claim that you were driving without due care.
Best bet is to talk to your insurers.They will give you better advice than here as these are just opinions on your loose description. including mine.

2007-03-09 23:30:27 · answer #1 · answered by coolkebab 4 · 0 0

I think the insurance companies will probabl;y say you are at fault as you were reversing out of a space or may say 50/50 at fault as you both were not looking properly

2007-03-09 20:38:13 · answer #2 · answered by kellie0702 3 · 1 0

It will probably be a 50/50 claim. He was at fault for not stopping, and you were also at fault for reversing against the flow of traffic towards a moving vehicle.

2007-03-10 10:14:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Let your insurance company sort it out. That's what you pay them for. My guess is that the claim will go against him as he was the driver behind and did not follow at a safe distance so as to avoid an accident.

2007-03-10 01:14:50 · answer #4 · answered by Sue W 3 · 0 0

there is not a brilliant age distinction between 14 and 17, yet there's a brilliant adulthood distinction. that's not significant how mature you're on your age, or how immature he's for his. 14 and 17 are in basic terms on distinctive planets. At 14 you have not have been given any person privileges, considering which you're actually not something extra desirable than a newborn. At 17 you cancontinual, artwork, pay taxes, marry and connect the militia with parental consent. In some months he would be an person. you're lots extra a newborn than person and he's a lot extra person than newborn. i comprehend that's not common, yet dating in teenaged years are confusing. human beings replace and mature at distinctive quotes, making super age communities complicated in this era. each now and then even dating somebody a twelve months older or youthful is in basic terms too lots suitable now. not because of the fact of age gaps, yet because of the fact on the adulthood ranges. The age of consent in maximum factors is sixteen. Him being 17 and additionally you being 14 creates a good conflict. If everyone found out he became even spanking your yet, making out with you, or doing something sexual it may be the top for him. And in my view i don't think of that's honest in a dating . Relationships are all approximately having the flexibility to be intimate and close to to a lover, that's the reason that's right to date in criminal a while that way you could accomplish that. you do not opt to smash his existence over this. So my suggestion in case you extremely love one yet another, wait a twelve months until you're sixteen. I mean if that's extremely going to artwork out that's going to once you're extra mature and criminal. I won't leap to the top that he's once you for intercourse, yet he's with you for a dating. And with relationships come sexual thoughts and stress to fill those desires. So it is going to ensue (nicely out of your paragraph including oral intercourse that's already happening) although that's in basic terms not criminal.

2016-10-01 21:15:48 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Normally anyone who has gone into your rear end is to blame as they should have been more observant to what you were doing.
if you were backing up your back light would have been on to show you were backing away reversing so yes he is in my book to blame he should have noticed and stopped.
I would explain detail to insurance and your drawing and let them thrash it out.
I once reversed out of parking in sainsbury my car which is a big one was well over half way out and some moron just went into me however they admitted they did not see me reversing and payed up without going through insurance.
id love on my car what they do on large vans "Warning I am reversing" lol

2007-03-09 20:48:04 · answer #6 · answered by momof3 7 · 0 0

If the car park is on private property than he cannot claim for your damage. Your insurance will pay for yours. Speak to your Insurance company about this, because that happened to me.

2007-03-09 20:36:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

He can claim on yours and you can claim on his. He may be at fault for what you call driving without due care, but you're also at fault for unsafe backing.

2007-03-10 05:12:37 · answer #8 · answered by bundysmom 6 · 0 0

If correct into what I'm thinking you drove forward into a space, reversed out possible to straighten up - and got hit. I say leave to the insurance to sort out.

2007-03-10 02:33:09 · answer #9 · answered by WelshLad 7 · 0 0

it really depends on point of contact. If you were notably coming out of the space before contact, then it was his fault. But If the you hit him in the door, it is your fault.
It all depends. Did you get a police report?

2007-03-09 21:46:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers