Can anyone help my friend and solve an arguement? Its weird but interesting?

Question

We were talking about circumcision and we both agreed that it looks much nicer when a guy is but can you actually feel the difference when you have sex? We both agreed it is the same with a comdom on but we could not agree about it without a condom

Answer 1

I think it feels totally different! You can sorta feel the skin moving.... well I guess I can't go into too much detail on this but I have, um, been there twice and I thought it felt different and, like, softer and I thought it felt a little better!
But I am glad most guys are circumcised cause it is supposedly much cleaner and, as we would all agree, looks much better!

Answer 2

I would argue that it looks nicer when it hasn't been mutilated, really. I find it painful to look at circumcised penises.

In any case, it is an interesting subject and I have read up on it before. Many sources (and some personal experience) suggest that men often have increased pleasure, because:

1. The glans is not desensitized because of daily chafing.
2. There are additional nerve ending in the foreskin which are lost after circumcision.
3. The foreskin offers more lubrication in the area, which means both parties suffer less from dryness and friction. The gliding is smoother and easier.

And possibly because of the added protection and lubrication, men may last longer since the intercourse isn't overwhelming the nerves with constant, direct stimulation.

As to women, Wikipedia had this to offer:

"Some researchers believe that the foreskin facilitates intercourse. In her book Sex as Nature Intended It, Kristen O'Hara argues that foreskin is a natural gliding stimulator of the vaginal walls during intercourse, increasing a woman's overall clitoral stimulation and helping a woman achieve orgasm more often and more quickly. She therefore believes that the absence of the foreskin and gliding action makes it more difficult for a woman to achieve orgasm during intercourse."

That said, there are studies that argue both sides. Some say there is a difference, some say there isn't - for men, and women. I imagine it really just varies from person to person.

Personally, it's more fun with an uncircumcised man. It's softer, smoother, more attactive, and there's more that can be manipulated. ;)

Answer 3

Are you conversing approximately an erect or non erect penis? the two way it somewhat is a bloody stupid argument, say you ultimately finally end up dating a guy and entirely fall in love with him. You get it on jointly and hit upon he's have been given the penis you hit upon least sexually beautiful ..... are you gonna run a mile, squealing interior the choice path? And every physique who thinks there is something incorrect with a appealing, organic, unbutchered penis is brainwashed and merits to go penisless for something of eternity.

Answer 4

i never been with a guy not circumcised but it does look much nicer and it makes me feel like they are a clean person far as body cleansing goes

Answer 5

Well, I don't know, my cousin told me a few days ago that she liked having sex without a condom because she felt more free.

P.S- I just found it disturbing how me and my cousin were at IHOP eating breakfast and she just said, "i like sex better without a condom cuz I felt more free."

Answer 6

trust me..it doesnt feel any different. a man gets an erection and everything stretches anyway..so there is nothing to feel.Its a lot cleaner to have a circumcised penis because a lot of guys dont clean themselves properly when they have a foreskin

Answer 7

Should be pretty much the same (and it's Soooo much better for oral)

Answer 8

feels the same.