So called Scientists?

Question

So, why do Biologists always attack the good questions, and answer the dumb ones? Are they not capable of thinking?

I have found some good questions are here yet no answers to them, usually all you get is well no intelligen person deny's evolution:

First of all that is crap only 98% believe it: What about the other two percent? Are they not actual scientists because they do not agree with you?

They generalize their statements: Like in a Science Magazine i read " No one has ever seen a dinosaur." Did he ask you before he wrote that? How about Alexander the Great? The Emperors of China who used to breed them to pull the float in parades? Adam and Eve? Noah? Cain?

That is not science people: And how do you explain the Big Bang? What about the young earth's atmosphere? It was toxic...

How do you even still think about using the Geologic Column? And the Fossils? They serve no purpose to evolution: Explain the Cambrian Explosion, and complex life suddenly appearing without

any evidence of an ancestor? How?

As Sir John Templeton said:

" Would it not be strange if a universe without purpose accidentally created humans who are so obsessed with purpose?"

Answer 1

EPH 6:12.

For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

and you will not shake my faith!

Answer 2

No one has ever seen a dinosaur, they died eons before humans were present on the earth. The 98% refers to all scientists, including some rather shady versions of "scientist" that study mostly soft science. The number of Biologists who don't believe in evolution is statistically insignificant (meaning less than 0.001%). The Big Bang is cosmological and not part of evolution. It is a theory undergoing rigorous study and has more and more support everyday. The earth's atmosphere was toxic, to us. The first life was okay with it. The geologic column and the fossils have everything to do with evolution, they are the scars of existence lft in the earth's skin and tell its story. There was nothing sudden about life's appearance, complex life appeared before the Cambrian Explosion. There aren't a lot of Biologists hanging out on this site, there are just a handful of us and we come here when we get sick of doing high-schooler's homework in the Biology section. You certainly drop a lot of terms but how many can you actually explain? I have read and reread the Bible many times. I don't believe it knowing it well, can you say the same for science? You have an honest question about biology (I can help you a little with chemistry but I am no good at explaining physics or mathematics) then email me or go to the Biology section. There is limited space here and there isn't room to give more than a glancing blow at some of these questions.

Answer 3

I'm not sure if this answers what you are asking.

Science is best and most convincing when it is explaining today's reality, because that's where we all live. For current reality they can even demonstrate the validity of their knowledge to each of us personally by applying it in the form of medicines, weapons, technology.

Yesterday, the distant past is over, it will never never happen again, and it will remain guesswork. Without time travel, we can't ever experience it first hand. We dig up old fossils, ice and rocks and guess at what it all means. Science extrapolates backwards from what we know of today, so that it is consistant with the evidence of the past we think we have found.

By combining guesses about the past with what we know about today, science can predict (prophesy) what could come tomorrow.

As far as science digging into the very old past, like the big bang, how life popped up, it doesn't really matter. How science answers today's problems and questions will remain the same. The big bang and life appearing where one time deals. Whatever happened that far back doesn't apply to what's happening today or will happen tomorrow. It's an interesting and challenging mind excercise for scientists, but will probably always be more guesswork and theoretical than provable.

Answer 4

Alexander the Great saw dinosaurs? Chinese Dinosaur Breeding programs for float transportation?

WOW

You are reading some really interesting stuff and the fact that you believe it doesn't surprise me, as you choose to believe 2% of the scientific community over 98%.

99.9% of irishment don't believe that Leprechauns are real. That means the .1% of them do believe in Leprechauns, would you fit into that small group, or use your reason to come to the conclusion that they probably don't exist? I guess if you really want to believe in Leprechauns, you choose to ignore the majority of educated people. The same applies to evolution, you admit that only 2% of scientists disagree with evolution. Why on earth would you go with the 2% unless it supported your uneducated belief system? In order to to that you have to ignor a large majority with a large pool of reason.

I guess that is why it is called faith......

Answer 5

Why would you *expect* evidence to exist from hundreds of million years ago and then conclude from the fact that we haven't found any that it *never* existed? That's bad reasoning. We have vast amounts of evidence where we *do* see the gradual evolution of life, so the obvious conclusion is that it happened in the Cambrian too, but we haven't yet found the evidence, or no evidence was preserved, for some reason.

Fossils are important because they represent millions of chances for data to contradict and thus disprove common descent, and yet they never have - not once.

Answer 6

No, I don't consider biologists who deny the fact of evolution to be real scientists. How could I? They're denying the single greatest theory science has ever given us.

And you really need to read up on evolutionary theory a bit, I recommend the TalkOrigins FAQ as an excellent place to start.

Answer 7

Thy house doth fall in disrespect.
Thy words do spew of offal.
Thy body fills with thy Rot.
Thou art a Troll.
Thou art a bigot.
Thou art an apostate of thine own religion.
Thy God doth abhor thee.

Answer 8

hmmm for that, if u are that mad at scientists why dont u actually find some stuff on it. There are tons of books at the college library, assuming u have a library card, check that out!

Answer 9

It might be awesome to ask scientists. We are informed spectators. I'm just starting my college degree to go into this field you hate so much. If you contact me in about 8 years, I should be able to explain.

Answer 10

what a waste of points on your part.
That guy who wrote 'no one has ever seen a dinosaur' was right. Humans evolved long after dinos.
'Where'd god come from?' and 'does God exist?'
The answers?
Nowhere, he DOESN'T exist, and NO.
What crap.

Answer 11

-blink-

First, are you trying to say that dinosaurs were bred to pull parade floats in China?

Second, would you first please attempt to understand the concepts before you attack them.

Thirdly, your quote doesn't have anything to do with biology.