Darwinism vs Creation?

Question

What do you think?

The evidence for Darwinism is not only grossly inadequate, it's systematically distorted. I'm convinced that sometime in the not too distant future, I don't know, maybe twenty or thirty years from now people will look back in amazement and say " How could anyoe have believed this?" Darwinism is merely materialistic philosphy masquerading as science, and people are reconizing it for what it is.
I believe that science is pointing strongly toward design. To me the development of the embryo cries out DESIGN. The Cambrian Explosion the sudden appearence of complex life, with no evidence of ancestors is more consistent with design than evolution. Homology in my opinion is more compatible with design. The origin of life certainly cries out for a designer. None of these things as much sense from a Darwinian perspective as they do from a design perspective.

Icarus what is your point? All those equally agree with the theory of Creation:

Dude open your eyes, the fossil rcord, they all agree with Creation too:

People are so sheltered and their hearts have become hardened.

As the Bible puts it willingly ignorant:

Which when translated in Greek means, dumb on purpose

Answer 1

No, science is not pointing towards Design. There's nothing really there to point to. It's not even a theory, let alone a supported theory.

On the other hand, evolution has much evidence behind it. If you think the evidence is grossly inadequate, then you haven't read enough about it.

Answer 2

Some years back, there were people who believed in a spaceship that was coming to take them away. In reality, the men castrated themselves to live in this closed community and they all committed suicide believing they would be taken away by the approaching spaceship.

In the past week, I've read how the lunar missions were a hoax. This written mostly by persons who weren't alive at the time, and have been conned by others into believing that what they regard as an incompetent political structure was able to pull it off. That's an important point--that they believe the present political structure is incompetent and yet they believe that they were able to pull off a sophisticated hoax for decades.

I also read how the earth is hollow and occupied by a superior race, and the proof is a tract of dubious authenticity.

Next is the attack on the world trade center in New York, and how the buildings were rigged with explosives to bring them down in spite of the fact that no one saw the extensive preparations to do so. There were plenty of people to see, if there was anything to see. There wasn't. Again, there's the question of how politicians derided as being incompetent were able to pull this off.

Now we get to creationism. One of the claims is that proper scientific journals don't publish anything about creationism. That's true, but what isn't said is that creationists make that claim without saying that the reason nothing is published is because they don't ever submit anything to those journals. Creationists make so many spurious claims that it's almost impossible to keep up with them. But flooding the net with claims doesn't make it true. And do they really do that? Yes, they do. To such an extent that creationism is generally regarded as being in the same league as Scientology. That isn't really good company. Most of those who reject evolutionary theory don't do so for "scientific" reasons. They do it because if they questioned creationism, their friends would abandon them. Peer pressure is very powerful.

Answer 3

You're saying evolution and Darwinism evidence is grossly inadequate, and you say that some guy in the sky that has NO proof is real. Give me a break. You have not even researched evolution, so don't speak...what was it you said? 'Systematically distorted' facts about it.
A poison dart frog is very bright. It is such a tiny thing. The reason for its bright colors is to warn predators that it has a lethal poison. No one 'designed' that, it is the animals natural adaptation. It is small, therefore it needs bright colors and poisons to stay alive.
Next time, provide proof that god exists. Except...wait! There is no proof. Aww, too bad!

Answer 4

The fact that every animal species and nearly every plant species on Earth have a similar embryonic development speaks not of a creator. A creator would have gotten to the point faster. It speaks to our evolution as species, evidence of our shared beginnings. Darwinism is limited to natural selection, an important part of evolution and the part that Mr. Darwin spent so much time studying. Evolution in general includes not just genetic mutation and natural selection but also mutation caused by behavioral changes and environmental changes and these changes themselves. Are actually trying to argue that life does not develop, adapt, change? We see it everyday, change and development have been part of the definition of life since humans first tried to define it.

Answer 5

There is NO evidence for evolution. It all comes down to faith. Faith in God. or faith in a man who claims to be descended from an ape.

Unfortunately, most scientists today are more interested in not making waves, than in the search for truth. Science cannot explain the origin of life. There is no way to observe it. It can't be demonstrated. So, stop calling evolution, science. It isn't.

Evolution is religion, with scientific terminology, sort of like Scientology. People with credentials are unwilling to jeopardize their careers, but privately, some of them will admit that they have their doubts.

The First Amendment gives evolutionists the right to believe, and even evangelize, but they have no business pushing their religious beliefs in the public schools under the guise of science.

Answer 6

Why did the galapogus island prove darwins theory.
Because it is a place where they have limited predators. God could have created all sorts of creatures great and small as it states in genesis, but over the years due to suvival of the fittest or different effect they changed. It is a proven fact people are growing taller and taller.
Did we evolve from lower beast no because my bible tells me I was created

Answer 7

what creates design is that you have to create one before you make any assumptions. to be creative is to open the mind to many possibilities of many different designs. which module can be used and which way can it go. through many creative designs of human evolution. maybe Darwin was right in another sense . that it is from our minds we evolved not through a physical sense. when an Embryo is created it evolves. and grows into a fully functionall human being. it is not through design but through and evoluntionary of change of the human body.which it creates it self you are what you eat.;and we have the power and methods to change and design our own bodys and shape. in another sense darwin was wrong in making an assumption and that creation came from another source.

Answer 8

In the beginning, God created the Heavens and the Earth!

its simple, so simple that these brilliant evolutionist can't believe it. They would rather pretend that because people get the flu, evolution must be true.

So lets see,...

Evolution is true because of the flu.........
OR
God Created the Heavens and the Earth?

I just cannot understand how anyone would think the flu makes evolution true!

but if it does, what does cancer prove?

How about the stomach flu that has been around for years and years, what does that prove?

And the common cold?

What does Heart disease prove?

And diabetes?

What about those guys who lost limbs and they NEVER grow back, what does that prove?

it proves that evolution is bunk!

Answer 9

You don't really care for answers, you just want to create yourself an illusion that everybody now is starting to think like you, and try to draw in as many as possible, like all religion junkies.
You say: "I believe that science is pointing strongly toward design".
You would.

Answer 10

You are right that Darwinism is no longer the primary thing. We've combined it with Genetics to get "Synthesis theory." That was about 50 years ago.

And design makes no sense, as you A.) cannot identify the creator and B.) Test it.