English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Will we be able to keep them from teaching this in physics classes?

2007-03-09 11:25:49 · 12 answers · asked by U-98 6 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

12 answers

Only if you can stock the school board with people who don't understand science.

Seems to be the current trend.

2007-03-09 11:39:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

http://pharyngula.org/images/teach_both_theories.gif

Ted - Actually Newton's theory of universal gravitation is very much a theory of physics, and one of the most difficult to fit in with other physical theories in the search for a GUT (grand unified theory). How is gravity transmitted? Present particle theories suggest bosons called gravitons, however these have never been observed even inside particle accelerators, there is as yet no evidence for them. Hence intelligent falling is actually much more plausible than intelligent design.

2007-03-09 19:31:27 · answer #2 · answered by Om 5 · 2 0

What a stupid question!! Gravity is not a theory of physics. It is a Law of Physics that is so precise you can actually compute the rate at which an object falls to earth.

You question reveals a very strong bias. It is classic stereotypical psuedo intellectual mush that only a mental midget would come up with.

2007-03-09 19:34:55 · answer #3 · answered by Ted 2 · 0 3

Man, sounds like a truth-bender paper that filled in some space in a magazine to exercise a mind to "see it" in a new way.

2007-03-09 19:40:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Gravity is a lie - Newton recanted on his deathbed and accepted intelligent falling. We are weighed down by our sins, that's why angels can fly.

2007-03-09 19:30:58 · answer #5 · answered by eldad9 6 · 6 0

it's just an idea to get a bit of consistency into creationism. if you attack one theory for being 'just a theory' you must attack all theories consistently for being 'just theories'. if you attack one idea based on its incompleteness then it is logical that you are attacking all theories for the same reason.

2007-03-09 19:45:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Excellent concept. Love it.

2007-03-09 19:33:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i think you have nothing to worry about.

these folks will never even graduate from high school.

2007-03-09 19:28:54 · answer #8 · answered by jen1981everett 4 · 1 0

http://www.theonion.com/content/node/39512

2007-03-09 19:28:54 · answer #9 · answered by Doc Occam 7 · 3 0

Oh please...very lame. I get it, but they are two very different things. Don't patronize me.

2007-03-09 19:29:55 · answer #10 · answered by The GMC 6 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers