....would the people our media now calls terrorists be referred to as 'the resistance' instead?
2007-03-09 07:17:00 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I'm glad you're back, Laptop. It's not the same here without you!
2007-03-09 07:25:42 · update #1
I can not answer your question. But I can say that we, Americans, are the terrorists there. Honestly - how would you react to a foreign army coming into your country? Would you not kill them too?
2007-03-09 07:19:44 · answer #1 · answered by The Pope 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
No... If Iraq were a Christian Nation, western media will call them enemy and now we will be in World War 3... Like the first and second ones...
2007-03-09 15:33:37 · answer #2 · answered by A A 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hmm.
Iraq was invaded because they were selling oil to France priced in euros. (The U.S. maintains its $8.3 trillion debt via the U.S. $ cash reserves all oil-buying countries are forced to keep.) That and restricting China's supply. (Before Shock and Awe, China was due to overtake the U.S. within 5 years. That estimate is now 15.)
It had nothing to do with the anti-Islam slander and propaganda, although that is an effective smokescreen. The wording would be different. But remember, France is a Christian nation too.
2007-03-09 15:23:52 · answer #3 · answered by The angels have the phone box. 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How does the media refer to the Christians in souther Sudan who have been fighting for their lives against Muslims for the last 30 years?
As long as they're being slaughtered, the media ignores them. Instead, they concentrate on the slaughter of non-Christians in Darfur, northwestern Sudan.
2007-03-09 15:21:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely
2007-03-09 15:28:53 · answer #5 · answered by rosbif 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Never, They are killing there own brothers and sisters. Not enemies or invaders. There are resistance fighters in Iraq but they are completely eclipsed by insensitive terrorists.
2007-03-09 15:25:38 · answer #6 · answered by sreekrishnakrupa 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No there would be a sharing of natural resources and a fight with the islamic nations.
2007-03-09 15:20:00 · answer #7 · answered by Tribble Macher 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Iraq were a "Christian" nation, they wouldn't have half the problems they do in the first place,
there wouldn't even be a war right now.
If all of the Middle East were Christian, not only would it be more democratic and secular, it would be richer too.
There wouldn't be people strapping bombs to their children or flogging themselves in bizarre bloody rituals either.
2007-03-09 15:21:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
Why don't you see the killing, like you do with Shiite and Shia, in Christian nations?
You made a great point.
2007-03-09 15:20:30 · answer #9 · answered by super Bobo 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Darn skippy they would.
I'm back. Nothing like Jack Bauer to calm my asse down from the hell-threateners.
2007-03-09 15:20:03 · answer #10 · answered by Laptop Jesus 2.0 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋