Like the LA Times and the Washington Post?
I think so because even though we have our own newspapers in Spanish, they aren't as good as the other ones.
2007-03-09 07:05:15 · 35 answers · asked by Antis Suck 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
No! You want to be in the US, LEARN THE LANGUAGE! If not, go back to where you came from.
I can picture it now, the LA Times in 120 different languages! What hypocrites!
2007-03-09 07:18:09 · answer #1 · answered by hera 4 · 8⤊ 3⤋
No! If you think your Spanish newspapers aren't good enough than create your own Spanish paper that is better. The LA Times and Washington Post should not be required to produce their product in multiple languages if they don't want to.
2007-03-09 07:13:32 · answer #2 · answered by akivi73 4 · 6⤊ 2⤋
No. if you want to read a major newspaper in Spanish, go back to Mexico.
2007-03-12 14:38:07 · answer #3 · answered by Kikyo 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, because the newspapers would go out of business. In order for newspapers to stay in circulation, Americans would have to be able to read the papers to buy them. Your suggestion is not feasible, business wise.
Evelyn - We already know that we don't want illegal aliens from Mexico in our country, because they are a plague. If the government does not stop the invasion there will be a rude awakening for illegal aliens here, it's called war.
2007-03-09 08:36:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Come on. Your questions get more and more rediculous by the day. WHat next? Do you think we should have a Mexican immigrant for president?
That holds about as much water as newspapers getting printed in Arabic.
Yeah Right.
2007-03-09 08:15:28 · answer #5 · answered by ICE AGENT 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Why not learn to speak the major language of this country ? English
I speak Spanish as well as English,why cant they ? 85% of Americans speak English as their first language. Why should the news papers have to cater to just Spanish,why not the languages of all the illegal aliens and legal immigrants as well. Totally cost prohibitive.
2007-03-09 09:37:36 · answer #6 · answered by Yakuza 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Here in the U. S. A., how about none. Why not this way, in the U. S. A., all in english, and only english. In Mexico, all in spanish. That way everyone is happy.
2007-03-09 07:53:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
No....learn English and you won't miss out on anything!
Maybe you can tell me why I can go to any country and get their news translated to English....but I can't go to Comcast Latino or the Spanish section of local newspapers and get it translated to English......but they can have the English translated to Spanish.
2007-03-09 07:40:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 1⤋
NOOOOOO learn english and read the english paper there should be no other printed language
2007-03-12 06:49:08 · answer #9 · answered by TheOneNOnlyTK 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that if the LA Times or Washington Post thought it was profitable, it'd be happening already.
2007-03-09 07:12:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 2⤋
Either way, if you read both Spanish and English, you are ahead of the game. Sucks if you only know one language, such a barrier!
2007-03-09 07:29:56 · answer #11 · answered by xcelix 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋