What would you say if I had proof would you take the time to look into it?
2007-03-09 06:43:22 · 18 answers · asked by DBznut 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
hey!
it really does depend! yeah! but mostly! i wud have taken time ot consider the fact u talking about! quite realistic ey?? bye!
2007-03-09 06:59:28 · answer #1 · answered by ---->>มาร์ญาม<<----! 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Science never can prove something as "truth". "Truth" is a religious term. Science will accept theories and models of reality but never claim something an absolute "truth". There is always room for more research, for refining a theory or even for overthrowing it entirely, and for discussion and reviewal. That's what science is all about. This does not fit very well with religion, as you can imagine.
You could base a religion on science only if you are prepared to doubt and review EVERY aspect of your religion. And most religions are not prepared to allow that.
2007-03-09 14:51:53 · answer #2 · answered by NaturalBornKieler 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I believe in Christianity, and, despite countless arguments to the contrary, it is supported 100% by science. It adds to its credibility. I think, in order to accept something as big as religion as truth, you need a lot more evidence than just scientifical, but if science doesn't logically follow it, then that religion is pointless to follow.
2007-03-09 14:48:10 · answer #3 · answered by Rach 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Religion and Science are compatible.
"The third principle or teaching of Bahá'u'lláh is the oneness of religion and science. Any religious belief which is not conformable with scientific proof and investigation is superstition, for true science is reason and reality, and religion is essentially reality and pure reason; therefore, the two must correspond. Religious teaching which is at variance with science and reason is human invention and imagination unworthy of acceptance, for the antithesis and opposite of knowledge is superstition born of the ignorance of man. If we say religion is opposed to science, we lack knowledge of either true science or true religion, for both are founded upon the premises and conclusions of reason, and both must bear its test."
2007-03-09 15:16:57 · answer #4 · answered by Reindeer Herder 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, thats obvious isn't it? If a religion is supported by actual science, then it is the truth, isn't it? Thats what Atheists have been saying all along... give us proof that your religion is right. If you can give us real proof, then we'll bleieve.
2007-03-09 14:56:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Religion is man made. Even if supported by science, I would not accept it. God - now if you could support that with science, I might buy it.
2007-03-09 14:47:47 · answer #6 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'd be happy to look into it.. which religion are you saying is supported by science?
2007-03-09 14:46:31 · answer #7 · answered by Kallan 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I study religions. It's a hobby of mine. Edit your question and provide the proof. I'd love to have a look see.
2007-03-09 14:47:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sure. My "religion" (I prefer the term "belief system") is fully supported by science.
2007-03-09 14:47:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, it wouldn't be religion anymore, like Revernd said. It would be also science.
2007-03-09 14:47:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes religion does accept science but does not base creation solely on it.
2007-03-09 14:46:25 · answer #11 · answered by laydeeheartless 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋