2007-03-09 05:08:21 · 14 answers · asked by WWTSD? 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
because it was obviously the work of an intelligent chipmunk.
=\
2007-03-09 05:11:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A squirrel. Come on. You really believe that?
2007-03-09 13:12:30 · answer #2 · answered by Kerilyn 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually, I could believe that. I could believe a squirrel like you created it... smart, but a little dizzy.
2007-03-09 13:12:21 · answer #3 · answered by ZER0 C00L ••AM••VT•• 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The assertion fails under modal logic, for one thing.
Richard Dawkins tried, unsuccessfully, to use that same argument against a group of Christian philosophers. He could not refute the ontological argument, but his attempt to use the ontological argument to 'proove' an absurdity was quickly refuted with modal logic.
2007-03-09 13:15:35 · answer #4 · answered by NONAME 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cars.
And all those little squirrels I see "sleeping" on the road.
2007-03-09 13:12:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because squirrels produce only squirrels.
It's called science - observation.
Did you ever see a half man half ape?
Only in junk science.
2007-03-09 13:13:43 · answer #6 · answered by andy r 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Life is fairly complicated so I would venture to guess it was an intelligent porcupine.
2007-03-09 13:14:00 · answer #7 · answered by Fastforward 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because I can't believe it was intelligent.
2007-03-09 13:11:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because in your picture you are laying there dead...did you take the wrong pill?
The Skeptical Christian
Grace and Peace
Peg
2007-03-09 13:11:33 · answer #9 · answered by Dust in the Wind 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well if it was.... praise be to the most high squirrel... but it wasnt so... thanks be to the most high, true and only living God.
2007-03-09 13:13:01 · answer #10 · answered by Haz the Preacher 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋