English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 states oppose North American Union
Eagle Forum working with legislators to halt globalists' plans

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: March 9, 2007
1:00 a.m. Eastern



© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com


Eleven states are working on resolutions that would oppose not only the implementation but the idea of a "North American Union," or other plans that would lead to the integration of the United States into a larger structure.

"Americans are rapidly learning the new vocabulary of the globalists," Phyllis Schlafly of Eagle Forum told WND, "and they don't like it."

While President Bush, many members of Congress, and Bush administration bureaucrats deny there are plans for a North American Union, under the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, those in state legislatures are taking no chances.

(Story continues below)

Already, 11 states have introduced resolutions to oppose the SPP, the NAU, and even the idea of the amero, a proposed currency that could be used to replace the dollar.

The resolutions also typically oppose the creation of North American Free Trade Act superhighways along the model of the Trans-Texas Corridor, the car-truck-train-pipeline corridor that is four football-fields wide and is being built parallel to Interstate 35 from Laredo, Texas to the border with Oklahoma, south of Oklahoma City.

Schlafly told WND that those lawmakers, and their constituents, are reacting against a wide range of concepts and structures being generated by the increasing pace of the integration of North America they see under the Bush administration.

"That's why state legislators are responding with resolutions criticizing a 'North American Community,' SPP, 'harmonization' of regulations, NAFTA superhighways, foreign-owned toll roads, totalization of Social Security, and speculation about the amero," Schlafly explained. "The groundswell is growing against measures that lead to 'economic integration' with other countries."

Schlafly also has joined with Howard Philips of the Conservative Caucus to create an organization specifically opposing the NAU and NAFTA superhighways.

"Phyllis Schlafly is doing a magnificent job leading the charge to oppose the North American integration at the state level," Phillips told WND. "Once again, we see the genius of Eagle Forum being able to communicate a message throughout America in terms that mobilize voters to take action."


American University Professor Robert Pastor

Robert Pastor is an American University professor who is using his book, "Toward a North American Community," to promote the development of a North American union as a regional government and the adoption of the amero as a common monetary currency to replace the dollar and the peso.

The resolutions are typically worded to oppose, in addition to SPP and the NAU, the construction of NAFTA Superhighways and the creation of the Amero as a North American unitary currency.

2007-03-09 03:28:48 · 10 answers · asked by illegals_r_whiners 2 in Politics & Government Immigration

10 answers

You know, when I was a kid, the idea that I would ever EVER think something like "You go, Phyllis Schlafly!" would have been unthinkable.

Sigh.

If mainstream press would discuss it, more would be against it. Look what happened in Europe. A number of the people in the EU countries were never even given the OPPORTUNITY to vote on it. And what a surprise to all when the French and Dutch voted against the constitution.

Why should we reorganize our countries to fund more trade profits for the elite?

2007-03-09 03:34:47 · answer #1 · answered by DAR 7 · 7 1

I am originally form Europe and the EU thing was chuffed down our throats. We were not able to vote on whether we wanted the Euro or not, because it inflated the value of our money massively and the government kept saying that we started to spent more money. Maybe in the beginning to get used to the need value of the coins, that had double.
The same thing with the constitution.We all received a summary, the real thing could be purchased for 25 euro. So we had to vote on something we didn't even no what it fully consisted.
I think the same thing is happening now here and everybody should be very alert on what the government is doing, is more than the media makes you believe.

2007-03-09 05:49:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

The 0'bama administration is a petty bunch of fools. they are like cheerleaders at a pajama social gathering the nighttime earlier a pep rally. If there replaced into every physique accessible who theory FOX replaced into beside the point, Barry lost them. FOX rankings have been already interior the path of the roof. Now, they are interior the stratosphere and the professional-administration information shops have taken a important hit. they could prefer a bail-out. Hate FOX or not, you may actually examine this maneuver as according to risk the stupidest element the White-living house has carried out subsequently some distance.

2016-10-17 23:08:51 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Its good news as long as the states opposing include Montana, N. Dakota, S. Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, California and Florida! The first seven states are those that the North American Highway would run through, from Mexico to Canada. Fyi.

2007-03-09 03:41:00 · answer #4 · answered by panthrchic 4 · 4 1

I am glad that enough is known about it for these eleven states to realize they needed to protest. I didn't know anyone was taking this threat seriously. It's a good start. But they and we better hurry, because as I understand it things have gone too far to stop it without a major country wide protest.

2007-03-09 05:21:48 · answer #5 · answered by DJ 6 · 1 1

Great news, but it's only 11 states. The fact that this is even an issue is amazing to me. How did this happen in the first place?

2007-03-09 03:35:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 7 1

I do want to thank you very much for your information which I think is good news to all of us, Americans. I do think, also that we have to keep our guards up because we can't trust this government because they like to work behind close doors and in dark rooms. I'm a Republican and very ashame of what this government is doing with the illegal and this so called North American Union, etc... Thank you and good luck.

2007-03-09 03:44:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5 3

Good

2007-03-09 08:16:02 · answer #8 · answered by kc 3 · 0 0

It's a good start! Not much has been said about this idiotic idea. Maybe people will wake up about it's dangers!

2007-03-09 03:53:29 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 5 2

this is the best news i have herd all week. thanks for sharing. thank god America is slowly being herd. and bush is nothing but a liar.

2007-03-09 05:41:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers