English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

All of the focus has been on the guilt of the United States, even though third world countries are clearing rainforests and using destructive agricultural practices, causing nitrogen rich runoff to suffocate the coral reefs. Rainforests and reefs are the biggest carbon sinks on Earth and perhaps we should spend more attention on restoring them. Carbon Dioxide is not a pollutant, the concern is just a buildup in the atmosphere. Right? So we need to focus on sequestration. Counting the net loss of Brazil's Carbon sequestration against the gain of not using petroleum, did the World gain? It seems to me that we could address CO2 levels by improving the quality of life for people in the underdeveloped world through education of better forestry and farming practices. (and moving past fossil fuels too).

2007-03-09 03:18:01 · 2 answers · asked by Brian L 4 in Environment

I don't believe a corn crop has a comparable CO2 capacity to virgin rainforest, particularly when you count the vertical density of rainforest. Also, the Summer Winter cycle is not balanced, the Ratio of Carbon in to out is like 4:1. Also, cleared forest generates large volumes of CO2.

2007-03-09 03:57:04 · update #1

If we were to not look at Brazil's impact on the Carbon issue based on the "you did it first" argument, you would have to then say you can't criticize the U.S. and Europe because they just happened to do it first. The argument is parochial and doesn't move us any closer to an answer.

2007-03-09 04:08:46 · update #2

2 answers

Probably a difficult question to answer.

By clearing rainforest and planting crops for grazing or harvest you are replacing one CO2 sink with another.

A crop of corn is producing oxygen and using CO2 just like the rainforest is.

Do you think it is right for the world to criticize Brazil for developing its resources the way the USA and Europe developed theirs?

2007-03-09 03:27:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's a factor, but it's not the big thing. The graph below shows the effect of plants on what we're doing. They decrease CO2 during the summer, and it increases during the winter. The big trend upwards is us, rapidly burning fossll fuels that contain carbon slowly gathered by plants over many thousands of years.

http://scrippsco2.ucsd.edu/graphics_gallery/mauna_loa_record/mlo_record.html

More plants help, and fewer hurt. But plants can't totally solve the problem we're creating.

2007-03-09 03:32:07 · answer #2 · answered by Bob 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers